emacs4cl VS ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols

Compare emacs4cl vs ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols and see what are their differences.

ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols

Jump to a symbol in current buffer with an Emacs ivy buffer (by jhchabran)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
emacs4cl ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols
22 1
361 0
- -
4.1 1.8
2 months ago about 3 years ago
Emacs Lisp Emacs Lisp
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

emacs4cl

Posts with mentions or reviews of emacs4cl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-29.

ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols

Posts with mentions or reviews of ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-11.
  • From Vim to Emacs in Fourteen Days
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Mar 2021
    I would say that what areally changes the game is to use evil (vi style bindings, 95% stays the same) with Emacs so you keep the muscle memory and you can keep making use of the common ex commands.

    I have gone back and forth between vim and emacs, usually for a bunch of years each time before currently settling on emacs with Doom. With the nativecomp branch, it's actually pretty snappy and doom emacs is a great setup to get started without drowning in the amount of configuration.

    I would say that I just love vim style input and modal editing, but doing that on top of emacs with evil mode and elisp is a better match for me than vimscript. The feedback loop you get with LISP and emacs is incredible when tweaking things to your liking.

    Every function is accessible, there is just a global scope and you can call pretty much anything. It's sounds like an horrible idea, but it also means you can quickly hack stuff by reusing the internals of a package you like.

    For example, it took me half an hour to initially POC this https://github.com/jhchabran/ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols by just skimming through the emacs-lsp codebase and randomly trying funcs in the repl to get an idea of what each function was doing.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing emacs4cl and ivy-lsp-current-buffer-symbols you can also consider the following projects:

crux - A Collection of Ridiculously Useful eXtensions for Emacs

lem - Common Lisp editor/IDE with high expansibility

portacle - A portable common lisp development environment

lsp-dart - lsp-mode :heart: dart

emacs-anywhere - Configurable automation + hooks called with application information

consult - :mag: consult.el - Consulting completing-read

public

doom-emacs - An Emacs framework for the stubborn martian hacker [Moved to: https://github.com/doomemacs/doomemacs]

.emacs.d - My [old] Emacs Config. I've moved to Doom now 👇

org-download - Drag and drop images to Emacs org-mode

helm-lsp - lsp-mode :heart: helm