eget
delta
eget | delta | |
---|---|---|
13 | 88 | |
747 | 20,717 | |
- | - | |
4.7 | 8.1 | |
about 1 month ago | 21 days ago | |
Go | Rust | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
eget
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- gh-dl: download releases from github repo
-
Install GitHub release binaries from the CLI interactively
would be good if you added a comparison with https://github.com/zyedidia/eget on your repo
-
The culmination of several months of work by dozens of people, Flatpak 1.14.0 is now out!
There used to be a project called ginstall.sh that kept like, a manually maintained database of various projects with static binaries and how to install them. It still exists, but maintenance stopped because its model was also not sustainable. Its use case is better covered by tools like asdf, stew, and if you want to get even simpler, eget.
- An ode to Flatpak (and Fedora Silverblue)
-
Asdf Performance
I'm a huge fan of asdf and have been using for years together with direnv! It's great to see how much effort is put into it! I hope more people adopt it so that we don't have to `curl | sh`! One thing I have issues with asdf is security as are no checksums, so, you if I project get compromised you'll get compromised, too. This, of course, is in addition to the third-party asdf plugin getting itself compromised (which is the greater risk). Last, but not least - I wish asdf came with something like eget [0] incorporated so that it can install 99% of the plugins directly and safely! Last, but not least - 99% of the plugins have almost identical code and all that changes is the repo, so, this should be generalized. For example, many years ago I made just one codebase of all HashiCorp plugins [1] and it's been working great!
[0]: https://github.com/zyedidia/eget
[1]: https://github.com/asdf-community/asdf-hashicorp
- get latest github
- Eget – Easily install prebuilt binaries from GitHub
- Zyedidia/eget: Easily install prebuilt binaries from GitHub
- Eget - Easily install prebuilt binaries from GitHub
delta
- Difftastic, a structural diff tool that understands syntax
- Popular Git Config Options
-
So You Think You Know Git – Git Tips and Tricks by Scott Chacon
Thanks for the difftastic & zoxide tips.
However, I've been using this git pager/difftool: https://github.com/dandavison/delta
While it's not structural like difft, it does produce more readable output for me (at least when scrolling fast through git log -p /scanning quickly
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Potencializando Sua Experiência no Linux: Conheça as Ferramentas em Rust para um Desenvolvimento Eficiente
-
Unified versus Split Diff
I'm currently waiting on the integration between Delta and Difftastic:
https://github.com/dandavison/delta/issues/535
Difftastic now has JSON output, whic should make it much easier to build this.
- Delta, a syntax-highlighting pager for Git, diff, and grep output
- Ask HN: What's a new developer tool you recently started using?
-
Magit
I'm surely in the minority here. I've been using Emacs for almost a decade now, but I just can't get into the Magit workflow. I've tried several times, but always end up going back to Git on the command line. I have dozens of aliases, shell integrations, a nice diff viewer[1], etc., and interacting with Git has become muscle memory. I can commit, cherry-pick, rebase, bisect, fix conflicts, etc., in a fraction of the time it would take me to navigate Magit's UI. I'm sure with enough practice, a Magit user could do this more quickly and efficiently, but honestly, with some custom-built porcelain, Git's UI is not so bad. Though this could very well be Stockholm syndrome after using it for such a long time...
For whatever reason, Magit's opinionated workflows never clicked with me. A part of it is the concern that it will do something weird to my repo that I'll then have to waste more time undoing manually. I usually don't trust sugary wrappers around tools. And another is the fact I don't use Emacs on all machines, and setting up Git on a remote system is just a matter of copying over my config and some shell integrations.
Also, on a more personal note, I find the cultish fanboyism whenever Magit is brought up slightly offputting. Does anyone have anything bad to say about it? No software can realistically be this infallible. :)
[1]: https://github.com/dandavison/delta
-
How to use Git?
For looking at diffs I still prefer the command line though, and use delta to view diffs between commits or branches.
What are some alternatives?
fetch - Download files, folders, and release assets from a specific git commit, branch, or tag of public and private GitHub repos.
diff-so-fancy - Good-lookin' diffs. Actually… nah… The best-lookin' diffs. :tada:
stew - 🥘 An independent package manager for compiled binaries.
difftastic - a structural diff that understands syntax 🟥🟩
bin - Effortless binary manager
vim-fugitive - fugitive.vim: A Git wrapper so awesome, it should be illegal
pastel - A command-line tool to generate, analyze, convert and manipulate colors
lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands
flatpak-external-data-checker - A tool for checking if the external data used in Flatpak manifests is still up to date
vim-gitgutter - A Vim plugin which shows git diff markers in the sign column and stages/previews/undoes hunks and partial hunks.
office365-pol - [OUTDATED] A PlayOnLinux script that utilizes the version of Wine made for CrossOver to run Microsoft 365 Apps / Office 365 without requiring any paid CrossOver components
gitui - Blazing 💥 fast terminal-ui for git written in rust 🦀