editing-traces
yjs
editing-traces | yjs | |
---|---|---|
1 | 53 | |
39 | 15,350 | |
- | 3.9% | |
6.8 | 8.6 | |
5 months ago | 2 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
- | MIT |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
editing-traces
-
JSON-joy CRDT benchmarks, 100x speed improvement over state-of-the-art
Hey! Author of diamond types and the (linked) editing traces repository here. Would it be possible to make & share an editing trace or two from your application? Even a single user editing trace would be super helpful - like a big list of which objects were replaced by what values, in order.
I really want json based CRDTs to be fast, but one of the problems we have optimising this stuff is that there aren’t a lot of real world data traces around to use as baselines for benchmarking. I don’t know which parts of automerge are slow, and without that knowledge I can’t make them fast. If we have some data from your application, most upcoming json based CRDTs will almost certainly work well for your use case.
If you’re up for it, flick me an email or just open a PR on https://github.com/josephg/editing-traces
yjs
- Show HN: Collaborate on your YC Application with CRDT-powered forms
-
Making CRDTs 98% More Efficient
One idea is just to use fewer random bits in peerIDs. Yjs (https://docs.yjs.dev/) gets away with just 32 random bits. If you compromise and use 64 random bits, then even a very popular doc with 1 million lifetime peerIDs will have a < 10^-7 lifetime probability of collision.
-
An Interactive Intro to CRDTs
I've seen it come up often in collaborative text editors.
Also see: https://github.com/yjs/yjs
-
JSON Schema Store
You are absolutely right that XML is better for document structures.
My current theory is that Yjs [0] is the new JSON+XML. It gives you both JSON and XML types in one nested structure, all with conflict free merging via incremental updates.
Also, you note the issue with XML and overlapping inline markup. Yjs has an answer for that with its text type, you can apply attributes (for styling or anything else) via arbatary ranges. They can overlap.
Obviously I'm being a little hypabolic suggesting it will replace JSON, the beauty of JSON is is simplicity, but for many systems building on Yjs or similar CRDT based serialisation systems is the future.
https://github.com/yjs/yjs/
-
Launch HN: Tiptap (YC S23) – Toolkit for developing collaborative editors
Note: https://github.com/yjs/yjs for collaborative "document edition, and user cursors"; has WebRTC, web socket, matrix.org backend
-
Wormholers, what can CCP and wormholers do to improve J-Space?
CCP needs to revamp proto anyway, due to recent exploits... practically, nothing really prevents 'em from using some sort of CRDT's to make the state of the sig view eventually consistent (yjs lib, if we're speaking frontendian).
-
How to use Yjs with Ruby on Rails?
Yjs framework: Because it is a CRDT implementation which provides collaborative editing and offline-first capability.
-
🐑🐑🐑 EweserDB, the user-owned database 🐑🐑🐑
No problem. The database CRUD features are just helpers as an abstraction on top of yjs: https://docs.yjs.dev/. Eweser adds schemas in the form of typescript types to make using it simpler, more structured, and interoperability easier.
- Ask HN: What is new in Algorithms / Data Structures these days?
- How does Google docs send the changes done by other users in real-time?