edh VS milewski-ctfp-pdf

If you agree with me, then you'll be interested in my WIP piece: https://github.com/e-wrks/edh

My engineering effort in https://github.com/e-wrks/edh/tree/0.3 (esp. the upcoming 0.3 release which introducing a true object system) may offer some healing options, it is written in Haskell, can be considered an object layer / surface language to expose core mathematical models written in Haskell to the external procedural world, with scripting (evals 100% JSON, and ~80% JavaScript and Python expression syntax) based RPC capability, where:

As for parsing, I'd like to share that I enjoyed a lot with Megaparsec. No formal grammar needs to be defined, custom operator with custom precedence and custom fixity turns out not that hard to implement (my working parser code for it here). I feel rather free to do what I need to do with it, e.g. that piece of code support interpolated expression as first class value as well:

Not research but I'm working on ergonomics out of best parts from main-stream languages (Go, Python, JavaScript, Haskell) as an engineering effort, with the language part being https://github.com/e-wrks/edh

Category Theory for Programmers by Bartosz Milewski (https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/releases)

Strangely similar name to the well-known 'Category Theory for Programmers'

https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf

There's this, but the programmer doesn't have to be working:

https://bartoszmilewski.com/2014/10/28/category-theory-for-p...

Milewski's "Category Theory for Programmers".

(3) category theory. I was never advised to read any, but found that bartosz's introduction really good. https://bartoszmilewski.com/2014/10/28/category-theory-for-programmers-the-preface/. Helps to rewire the brain.

It's also possible to model programming languages using category theory, but I know less about that. If you're interested in following this up, then Benjamin Pierce has what I'm told is a good introduction to category theory for computer scientists, and Bartosz Milweski has an online book (it might be available in hard copy as well, I'm not sure) called Category Theory for Programmers. I believe simple programming languages like the simply typed lambda calculus end up being modelled as Cartesian closed categories.