milewski-ctfp-pdf VS CppCoreGuidelines

Category Theory for Programmers by Bartosz Milewski (https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf/releases)

Strangely similar name to the well-known 'Category Theory for Programmers'

https://github.com/hmemcpy/milewski-ctfp-pdf

There's this, but the programmer doesn't have to be working:

https://bartoszmilewski.com/2014/10/28/category-theory-for-p...

Milewski's "Category Theory for Programmers".

(3) category theory. I was never advised to read any, but found that bartosz's introduction really good. https://bartoszmilewski.com/2014/10/28/category-theory-for-programmers-the-preface/. Helps to rewire the brain.

It's also possible to model programming languages using category theory, but I know less about that. If you're interested in following this up, then Benjamin Pierce has what I'm told is a good introduction to category theory for computer scientists, and Bartosz Milweski has an online book (it might be available in hard copy as well, I'm not sure) called Category Theory for Programmers. I believe simple programming languages like the simply typed lambda calculus end up being modelled as Cartesian closed categories.

You need to talk to Bjarne and Herb...

"C++ Core Guidelines" - https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines

In addition to the other comments -

TypeScript deliberately takes a "good enough" approach to improving JavaScript, instead of designing an ideal but incompatible approach. For example, its handling of [function parameter bivariance](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-compatibil...) is unsound but works much better with the existing JavaScript ecosystem. By contrast, a more academic functional programming language would guarantee a sound type system but would be a huge shift from JavaScript.

By analogy, Herb Sutter is arguing that something like the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines), with tooling help in this new Cpp2 syntax, can bring real improvements to safety. Something like Rust's borrow checker would bring much stricter guarantees, backed by academic research and careful design, but would be incompatible and a huge adjustment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2olsGf6JIkU

Take a look at Effective Modern c++ by Scott Meyers and the ISO c++ core guidelines. These resources are great for learning how to write better, more modern C++. I don't think it would be hard to grasp if you're already familiar with the language, just make sure to actually write some code which makes use of this stuff, otherwise it's easy to forget.

Look to the C++ Core Guidelines. It's not perfect, it has some flaws, including some sabotaging advice apparently adopted for political reasons. But at least it has some C++ authorities (Bjarne and Herb) as authors.