announcements
Nuget Package Manager
Our great sponsors
announcements | Nuget Package Manager | |
---|---|---|
16 | 29 | |
1,231 | 1,480 | |
3.6% | 0.5% | |
0.0 | 8.5 | |
almost 2 years ago | 11 days ago | |
HTML | ||
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
announcements
- BinaryFormatter is being removed in .NET 9
- Announcing the .NET Virtual Monolithic Repository · dotnet/announcements
- .NET Announcing a Monorepo
- .NET's Monorepo
-
Vulnerability found affecting System.Data.SqlClient in Microsoft .Net (Framework, Core, 5/6)
I don't think that works. That would alert you about the security alerts on the Security tab of the dotnet/announcements repo, which are empty, not about issues that contain information about .Net security issues.
-
.NET: Modelo Criptográfico, lo que necesitas saber.
.NET Core 2.0 Cryptography uses Apple Security Framework on macOS · Issue #21 · dotnet/announcements (github.com)
-
Situation right now
Yeah, it's a fun meme, but there have been a few nasty RCE vulnerabilities patched on .NET Core in the last couple years. Like this one: https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/178
-
.NET Core 2.1 container images were deleted from Docker Hub!
If you started receiving errors when pulling old versions of dotnet docker images (like the .NET 2.1), it's because Microsoft deleted them from Docker Hub on August 21st, 2021. That date is not a coincidence, the .NET Core 2.1 reached end of support in the same date. For more details take a look at the official dotnet announcement or also the dotnet blog. In my case, the error bellow was thrown in the stdout when pulling the microsoft/dotnet:2.2-aspnetcore-runtime image:
-
Are you using .NET on Arch Linux? Is the experience good?
I'm not entirely sure what that means. We're done porting .NET Framework APIs to .NET Core / .NET 5. .NET Framework is what it is now, and .NET is moving forward with .NET 6+. If it is worth porting your code to .NET 6, it is. If not, then it isn't. Both can be good choices. .NET Core on Linux, however, is absolutely not preview.
- NuGet package restore broken on .NET 5+ with Removal of Trust of Verisign CA
Nuget Package Manager
-
Problem with *.csproj and *.nuspec file to include static files into a nuget package
- https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/8843
- what do you find most frustrating about dotnet?
-
.NET 8 is on the way! +10 Features that will blow your mind 🤯
GitHub Issue
-
Docker build fails on GitHub Action after net7 update
Similar issue here: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/28971. Following the breadcrumbs it looks like it may be a NuGet issue, reported here: https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/12227
-
Visual Studio- Problem adding nuget packages
Your issue appears to be related to not having the appropriate permissions to the Nuget folder (so says the error). There is an existing Bug/Ticket open on the Nuget github for this exact issue. There are a few solutions and/or workarounds listed through the conversation that you can try: https://github.com/NuGet/Home/issues/12162. Unfortunately I do not have a Mac to validate the solutions or the issue myself.
-
Can't get webassembly project to build
sounds like ur terminal has no internet connection here is a setup for configuring a proxy
-
Centralized package management and dotnet add package command
The NuGet team is actively working on adding support for CPVM in .NET SDK 7.0.100/VS 17.4. There was a spec for the initial work that you can read at NuGet/Home, and they're looking to polish up and incorporate that work soon.
-
Adding Auditing to Pip
How do you currently feel about attaching the experience to install or when restoring packages? Various ecosystems do this and some get flak for it because of how many transitive dependencies and known vulnerabilities in comparison to others. I'm mostly curious because I'm working on a similar proposal here:
https://github.com/NuGet/Home/pull/11549
There's definitely a fine balance of noise, but how do you feel about it?
- License Changes for Six Labors Products
- Package integrity check failed
What are some alternatives?
netcoredbg - NetCoreDbg is a managed code debugger with MI interface for CoreCLR.
AxoCover - Nice and free .Net code coverage support for Visual Studio with OpenCover.
ASP.NET Core - ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
VSColorOutput - Color highlighting to Visual Studio's Build and Debug Output Windows
CoreCLR - CoreCLR is the runtime for .NET Core. It includes the garbage collector, JIT compiler, primitive data types and low-level classes.
VsVIM - Vim Emulator Plugin for Visual Studio 2015+
jellyfin-server-freebsd - jellyfin-server component for freebsd
Web Essentials - Visual Studio extension
jellyfin-skiasharp-native - SkiaSharp Module for Jellyfin
Side-Waffle - A collection of Item- and Project Templates for Visual Studio
SqlClient - Microsoft.Data.SqlClient provides database connectivity to SQL Server for .NET applications.
Git Diff Margin - Git Diff Margin displays live Git changes of the currently edited file on Visual Studio margin and scroll bar. Supports Visual Studio 2012 through Visual Studio 2022