dotfiles-nvim VS nvim-moonwalk

Well it certainly doesn't know what to do with my nvim dotfiles since I use fennel for it all

Yes, the init.fnl is here

Dotfiles themselves if it helps get the layout across

I use fennel for all my Neovim stuff (besides whatever plugins I contribute to ofc). Obligatory dotfiles

Config in fennel

Configs if interested

Example from me: fzf command customized previewer source previewer

Here's my dotfiles if it helps at all. Written with Aniseed

That's where Kreative comes into play. Built off the backbone of kat.nvim, Kreative is designed to be as end user focused as possible. Absolutely no code knowledge is needed, simply create an appropriate file in /colors in your config for the colors you want, and Kreative will handle the rest when you set your colorscheme to it. An expanded file should only be 16 lines of Lua, most of that expanded table values. Just look at this example, 19 lines even with expansion and empty lines! Just input 8 colors, and you're off

There's also gpanders/nvim-moonwalker, which advertises Fennel in it's readme but works for any x->lua language you return the lua code for, ie: teal, moonscript, uh... others?

I used Hotpot for ~a year or so and loved it. I recently discovered https://github.com/gpanders/nvim-moonwalk as an even more minimalist option.

moonwalk which supports Fennel by way of supporting any x → lua language. Not sure if it tracks dependency changes when recompiling though* as it's a more generic solution.

https://github.com/gpanders/nvim-moonwalk allows you to use any language that compiles to Lua.