docker-ripper VS scrutiny

I haven't tried this but it looks like a very good option if you need to do a lot of discs https://github.com/rix1337/docker-ripper

So I was able to mess around with it for a bit last night. Aside from attaching it to a VM, which worked as expected, the only thing I was able to do with it was this https://github.com/rix1337/docker-ripper

https://github.com/automatic-ripping-machine/automatic-ripping-machine or https://github.com/rix1337/docker-ripper

Do you use docker? You could use the ripper container and use handbrake container. You’d set the output directory of ripper to be the handbrake input directory. Just put the disk in the drive you have setup and ripper will do it’s thing. After it’s done handbrake will detect a movie and encode it using your settings.

Ripper: Automatic Blu-ray ripping

I've noticed a quite nice feature in Scrutiny, where older disk temp data is lower resolution than recent data. In queries it would probably look like that:

I cannot look into the scrutiny script. The website recommends "something like"

I would always run the fantastic Scrutiny and set up notifications, so at the very least if some stat changes for the worst you might get a bit of early warning.

Hi. I am trying to understand whether I should trust TrueNAS Scale smartctl tool or Scrutiny (https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny) for S.M.A.R.T results.

Quick Google search later to answer my own question, scrutiny seems to be it. That with LibreNMS sounds like a pretty healthy combo.

https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny should do the trick

Its right there: https://github.com/AnalogJ/scrutiny/blob/master/docker/example.hubspoke.docker-compose.yml