Python-docker VS awesome-compose

This defines which image to inherit from, In this case we are using a Python image with the Python 3.11 version running on a slim version of the Bookwork version of Debian linux. Image definitions can be viewed from the DockerHub TAG link such as the python:3.11-slim-bookworm and official images like this one typically have pretty complicated definitions in order to get them highly optimized.

> You are going to eventually run into the same issue most people trying to use Alpine Linux just because of simplicity and being lightweight run: musl is not a completely ABI-compatible seamless replacement to glibc and might cause issue with statically linked binaries, and other annoying issues you won't foresee.

Well, if all you need is the server to run Docker/Podman, SSH and some other limited amount of packages, it shouldn't be too bad. Of course, there are also horror stories of Alpine resulting in way worse performance in select use cases: https://github.com/docker-library/python/issues/509 and there's the fact that Alpine might be popular inside of containers, but way less so outside.

Also, because of the short EOL cycle, I personally ditched Debian on servers (and Alpine in containers) myself for Ubuntu everywhere: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/using-ubuntu-as-the-base-fo... A bit of a polarizing move (though RPM distros aren't much better at the moment), but it seems to have worked out for me in the end.

Doesn't mean that someone can't try, though, maybe their use case is suitable for Alpine.

This is the actual raw Dockerfile: https://github.com/docker-library/python/blob/master/3.9/slim-bullseye/Dockerfile

I usually cannibalize Docker Community's examples: Here

Official Docker image of Python 3.10.5-slim

If you want Python v3.7, perhaps try FROM python:3.7 (link)

Navigate into the Python directory and configure and ensure enable-optimization option is added as shown in the command below.

It looks like you are running into this bug: https://github.com/docker-library/python/issues/674

examples here: https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/

Docker compose wraps the app and db in a few lines of config: https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/tree/master/offici... the extra config is for networking / db connections - you don't get those on Android because you don't run network services on it.

K8s can do the same thing, but has more options.

Simplicity: Docker Compose is easy to use, requiring no extensive DevOps knowledge.

I'm a big fan of people who write guides to help - but to balance this, this can be deployed with a one liner, with NPM, its database and the WP frontend, with one line with docker-compose. It would be quicker to update, faster to boot and use noticeably less resources.   Good work on documenting your OVA conversion though, as that is still useful and can be generalized. :-)

I'm trying to use the react-express-mysql awesome-compose as a framework for setting up multiple react apps that are tied to the same domain. Once dev is complete, I update the Dockerfile for the frontend to add in Nginx and have Nginx serve the frontend so that it is not running using npm start. I additionally am using Nginx Proxy Manager as a reverse proxy to route where I need and manage SSL termination for me.

Take a look at https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose pick your stack and use docker compose up -d

Check out awesome compose there might be overlap projects

Maybe easier to link to a recommended docker compose config that also fails : https://github.com/docker/awesome-compose/tree/master/official-documentation-samples/wordpress/