docker-bench-security VS renovate

Scanning your container images for vulnerabilities is a good approach. But this scanning is not one time job, it should be done regularly (weekly, monthly, etc.) You need to follow vulnerability reports and fix all of the vulnerabilities as soon as possible. I recommend some open-source tools that could be useful: Trivy, Docker-Bench, Grype.

For Docker configuration I have used this in the past (it utilizes the CIS Docker Benchmark): https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security

So the main tool to scan against the CIS Docker benchmark (I'm presuming that's the one you're interested in) is https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security .

git clone https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security.git cd docker-bench-security sudo sh docker-bench-security.sh

when deploying images on cloud, I always run it thru "docker bench security" It helps finding potential security holes in my images.

Use Docker Bench for Security to audit your container images

Other tools you can use are linux-bench, docker-bench, kube-bench, kube-hunter, kube-striker, Cloud Custodian, OVAL, and OS Query.

I run https://github.com/docker/docker-bench-security against my environment. I would determine what was non-applicable/not scored and then start with scored. Then I would do not scored. My team had made their own Dockerfiles when I started and just grabbed whatever image/version and getting things baselined was not fun. I had to do this for docker-compose and stay on version 2 yml as otherwise I had to go to swarm.

Once Renovate is integrated to track your GitOps repo, it will look for Glasskube packages and compare their versions to the official package repositories. When new versions are available, it will automatically open a PR. Once merged, you’ll be running the latest versions of your packages.

Thanks for your input, let me comment on your points one by one.

> However things like helmfile with renovate paired with a pipeline is my personal preference even if just for ensuring things remain consistent in a repo.

Glasskube packages can also be put inside a GitOps repository as every package is a CR (custom resource). (They can even be configured via the CLI using the `--dry-run` and `--output yaml` flags and than put into git. In addition we are working on pull request to support package updates via Renovate: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/issues/29322

> The package controller reminds me a lot of Helm tiller with older versions of helm, and it became a big security issue for a lot of companies, so much so that helm3 removed it and did everything clientside via configmaps. Curious how this project plans on overcoming that.

As helm3 is now a client side tool only, that means that it can't enforce any RBAC by itself. OLM introduced Operator Groups (https://olm.operatorframework.io/docs/advanced-tasks/operato...) which introduces a permissions on an operator level. We might introduce something similar for Glasskube packages. Glasskube itself will still require be quite powerful, but we can than scope packages and introduce granular permissions.

To get started with Mend Renovate, the comprehensive official documentation provides detailed instructions on installation, configuration, and best practices. Additionally, the Mend Renovate community forum offers a platform for users to connect, share experiences, and access the collective knowledge base.

To get started with Mend Renovate, the comprehensive official documentation provides detailed instructions on installation, configuration, and best practices. Additionally, the Mend Renovate community forum offers a platform for users to connect, share experiences, and access the collective knowledge base.

This month, I gave a talk with my Zenika colleague Lise at the DevoxxFR conference about Renovate and Dependabot, two great tools to help you automatize and upgrade your dependencies.

There is no built-in Renovate Bot on a self-hosted GitLab. What can we do to set it up and enjoy all the benefits of automatic dependency updates?

> Yes, it is awesome until you have to sysadmin it, apply updates, patch it, fix security holes, etc. I am not saying all self-hosted solutions are like that. There are exceptions. However, the majority of open-source self-hosted solutions require a lot of extra work.

I'm currently self-hosting 10 different applications on my local server, which represents everything I've ever seen that looked fun or useful to me. Every one of them had a Docker image with an example compose file, which means updating them just requires periodically running Renovate [0] on the repo that stores all my compose files and then running a script that docker compose pulls the updates. It takes maybe 10 minutes every other week, and is actually kinda fun.

It helps that all the apps are only accessible from within my VPN, so I'm not too worried about fixing security updates within a tiny time window.

[0] https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate

This is a big deal! Where did you read this? I found:

https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions/26917

Renovate is an automated dependency management tool that can be used to keep your dependencies up-to-date. It can be configured to automatically create pull requests to update your dependencies, and it supports a wide range of package managers and platforms.