dockcross VS C++ Middleware Writer

We use the add_executable command to build executables with itk-wasm. The Emscripten and WASI toolchains along with itk-wasm build and execution configurations are contained in itk-wasm dockcross Docker images invoked by the itk-wasm command line interface (CLI). Note that the same code can also be built and tested with native operating system toolchains. This is useful for development and debugging.

Docker is great for self-contained build environments, no risk of them breaking each other. Eg. https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross

It is C ++ 11 compatible, I recommend C ++ 17, it is cross-platform (x86, ARMv7, ARMv8, PowerPC, windows, Linux...), Thanks to [dockcross](https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross) .

First of all, I learned basic instructions of AArch64 and how to use cross compile COOL codes into AArch64 assembly codes via dockcross.

It is C ++ 11 compatible, I recommend C ++ 17, with OpenMP (For better multi-core performance), it is cross-platform (x86, ARMv7, ARMv8, PowerPC, windows, Linux...), Thanks to dockcross .

I would not say it easy, but checkout this setup: https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross

I still maintain a single LXC container for each service. So far I'm doing this to run Nginx Proxy Manager and Vaultwarden, as well as a development container where I use Docker to run cross-platform builds with dockcross.

xcross provides Docker images with toolchains for a wide variety of different architectures, C and C++ standard libraries, and both bare-metal and Linux-based systems. A complete list of supported targets can be found here. This differs from dockcross in that it supports numerous more architectures and C runtimes.

I use unique_ptr, but not as much as I used to. I've never used shared_ptr. This is my library that uses some C++ 2020 and 2017 features.

I started with Linux in the late 90s. I switched to FreeBSD around 2013 and returned to Linux a couple of years ago. Io_uring was the main reason I had to come back. At first I ported the back tier of my code generator back to Linux and then I ported the middle tier from being POSIX based to Linux.

Are there others that minimize multithreading and opt for multi-processing with single threaded processes? Call me a simpleton, but this approach eliminates some of the most difficult bugs by design. Here's an example of one of my single-threaded servers. The network io is asynchronous, but the file io is synchronous. Thanks

I've been working on this program for 13 years now. At one point it had 7 global variables and none of them were const. Now it has 4 global variables and 2 of them are const.

in one of my programs. I'm thinking about changing it to:

It's a merger of services and code generation: an on-line code generator that outputs low-level messaging and serialization code based on high-level input. It's implemented as a 3-tier system and uses output from the code generator in each tier. There's also a traditional library that's part of the repo.

Support for more data types for message lengths. Previously message lengths were always 4 bytes. I used this, for example, to reduce the size of the type used for message lengths between the front and middle tiers of the CMW from 4 bytes to 2 bytes.

More concretely, I use it to generate code that's used in each of the tiers mentioned above. The link is to one example of that.