FastEndpoints VS ASP.NET Core

In a recent podcast episode I recorded with Nick Chapsas, we discussed both Minimal API and Mediatr (due to be published on the 1st April). He mentioned a library I hadn't heard of before called Fast Endpoints, which is yet another option. So many different ways to skin a cat. I haven't used Carter, but did use Nancy back in the day.

There's also Fast Endpoints as another way of doing a similar concept (This has API design issues imo, but the concept is solid). It ends up being similar to how a lot of people use MediatR, it's just instead of using controllers you use MapXXX to call MediatR. This just allows people to cut out the MVC overhead.

i believe i've built such a thing. or at least something close to that ;-)

awesome! page looks a bit empty. maybe my rest api framework belongs there too as it's an implementation of REPR pattern https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/FastEndpoints

that's why integration/functional testing with WebApplicationFactory is the way to go.

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.