dbt-sessionization VS Hugo

Googling around I found this repo from rudderstack which shows several examples of DBT models about how one could handle this situation, but I haven't found much else - maybe I'm asking google the wrong question.

RudderStack is an open-source customer data platform that empowers you to track your customer events from your web, mobile, and server-side sources in real-time. We have also open-sourced our primary repository - rudder-server - on GitHub. This article will walk you through the process of integrating your Hugo site with RudderStack using our JavaScript SDK. It will also help you track the real-time user events and send them to the destinations of your choice.

By using RudderStack to understand how users are finding and interacting with your site and then combining that with the data collected by your Marketo forms, you'll get deeper insights about your potential customers and provide higher quality leads to your sales team.

RudderStack lets you send the rich analysis from your warehouse to your entire customer data stack. Read more about how RudderStack's Warehouse Actions feature unlocks the data in your warehouse.

RudderStack is an open-source Customer Data Pipeline that enables you to track events from your web, mobile, and server-side sources and send them to your whole customer data stack in real-time. We have also open-sourced our primary GitHub repository - rudder-server.

We highly recommend checking out our Sessionization repository on GitHub to see how to use the sessions in a practical scenario.

At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo.

This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts.

Hugo

Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms.

As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g. https://gohugo.io/hosting-and-deployment/hosting-on-github/), your normal workflow will simply be to edit markdown and do a git push to make your changes live. There are a number of pre-built themes (e.g. https://themes.gohugo.io/) you can use, and these are realtively straightforward to tweak to your requirements.

Create the technical documentation of your project You can use any of the following options: * A wiki, like the ArchWiki that uses MediaWiki * Read the Docs, used by projects like Setuptools. Check Awesome Read the Docs for more examples. * Create a website * Create a blog, like the documentation of Blowfish, a theme for Hugo.

Doing this made me appreciate existing SSGs like Hugo and Next.js even more👏👏

I suggest hugo: https://gohugo.io/

Generates a completely static website from MD (and other formats) files; also handles themes (including a lot of them rendering well on mobile), and different types of content - posts, articles, etc. - depending on the theme.

It's open source and, being completely static, cheap as fuck to self host.