db-benchmarks VS logs-benchmark

> I decided to experiment with this setup and the NY Taxi Dataset. The initial goal was to populate ElasticSearch with ~14 million rows, loading data from a compressed parquet file of ~350 MB.

> I tried multiple times, but the operation failed continuously, due to JVM memory constraints

Here's a script https://github.com/db-benchmarks/db-benchmarks/blob/main/tes... which loads 1.7B NYC taxi ride documents into Elasticsearch.

In general, you are correct about another missing key: since we added an exception for MySQL by including two keys, we should perhaps optimize it to the maximum and add the rest as well. However, it would be better to make this more visible directly within the results then. I've created a task about it https://github.com/db-benchmarks/db-benchmarks/issues/30 . Thank you for pointing this out. If you see more issues, feel free to file them on github.

> It's interesting to note that Elasticsearch and Opensearch are general purpose search engine, Solr as well. They are all powered by Lucene, the popular and performant search engine library.

Another search engine which can be considered general, is not based on Lucene and is not less powerful than Elasticsearch/Solr is Manticore Search [1]

[1]: https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch

> I would love to see some benchmarks by category :)

I'd love too. We started this work on db-benchmarks [2] , hopefully we'll have resources to continue it. Contributions are very welcome. It's 100% opensource [3]

[2]: https://db-benchmarks.com/

Comparing full-text search engines on queries that aren't full-text search are of course slow, these tests should be adapted to the proper usage of the tested DBs and not just benchmarked across the board..

Example: https://db-benchmarks.com/?cache=fast_avg&engines=elasticsea...

Clickhouse: no tuning , just CREATE TABLE ... ENGINE = MergeTree() ORDER BY id and standard clickhouse-server docker image.

MySQL and Percona Server for MySQL: no tuning , just CREATE TABLE ..., FULLTEXT(story_text,story_author,comment_text,comment_author))and standard mysql docker image .

https://db-benchmarks.com is a platform and a framework for making the most fair, transparent and open source database and search engines benchmarks. No more benchmarketing, because:

I am a maintainer at SigNoz. Nice to see OpenObserve's belief that the future of Observability should be OpenSource. We chose clickhouse rather than building a database as it takes multi-year effort to move a db to maturity and clickhouse has been battle-tested at Yandex, Uber and Cloudflare. Clickhouse also provides native integration with s3 and other blob storages. Our users have been using disk as hot storage for a week and moving the data to s3 after that. Tiered storage is really cool in terms of query performance.

We have also seen logs data of our users at a compression ratio of 30x/40x. We have published a logs benchmark (https://github.com/SigNoz/logs-benchmark) where the data is very high-cardinal (causing a compression factor of only 2.5x). Would love to see how does OpenObserve perform in that dataset someday.

Wishing you best for the journey ahead.

Did you update the benchmark after you got feedback from this user at Hacker News or after you got the feedback that including Loki here is kinda pointless?