museo VS Karate

Compare museo vs Karate and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Access the most powerful time series database as a service
  • SonarLint - Clean code begins in your IDE with SonarLint
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
museo Karate
1 25
1 6,895
- 4.3%
10.0 8.1
over 5 years ago 10 days ago
Ruby Java
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of museo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-25.


Posts with mentions or reviews of Karate. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-03.
  • Cucumber Maintainer out of Job and future of the project is uncertain
    3 projects | | 3 Mar 2023
    This is why we need better tools which will give benefits for the added complexity. If you need to create both the feature files AND the code, it's just complexity with little benefits. But frameworks like or are hiding this complexity and remove the code layer entirely. Which, in my view, this is where you need to be in 2023, particularly for API testing.
  • Need a fully local web alternative to Postman
    6 projects | | 2 Feb 2023
    - - - -
  • Lama2: Plain-Text Powered REST API Client for Teams
    4 projects | | 1 Jan 2023
    Congrats on the launch ! I'm the lead dev of [Karate]( and was wondering if you had come across it. I strongly agree that collaboration should be [via Git]( and the IDE and traditional solutions fall short. I hope Karate's syntax passes your "memory friendly" test :) We get regular feedback is that it is easy to read and even non-programmers can pick it up. One thing I feel we do really well is chaining of HTTP requests. And we have plugins for [IntelliJ]( and [VS Code](

    Maintaining a tool like this as open-source is hard, all the best !

  • Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text
    14 projects | | 25 Nov 2022
  • Hurl 1.8.0, text based integration tests for REST APIs and web sites
    6 projects | | 7 Nov 2022
    FWIW is 83% Java.
    6 projects | | 7 Nov 2022
    I'm doing something similar but taking the approach of karate framework making it a kitchen sink of e2e testing tools. love to see another rust based solution! I might open source mine at some point, I've implemented curl + webdriver, I will expand to support other things in my stack like desktop automation.
  • Best tool for automated API e2e testing
    2 projects | | 27 Oct 2022
  • What is the best self hosted API-testing tool in 2022 ?
    2 projects | | 16 Jul 2022
    Try Karate
  • Framework for end to end testing of microservices
    5 projects | | 3 Jul 2022
    Take a look at Karate.
  • Launch HN: Karate Labs (YC W22) – Open-Source API and UI Test Automation
    2 projects | | 13 Jun 2022
    Hi HN, Peter here, founder of Karate Labs ( joined by my co-founder Kapil. Karate is an open-source solution unifying API and UI test automation, including mock servers and performance testing (

    Back in 2016, I was part of the API platform team at Intuit. An issue had been slowing down the team: a particular test for a set of key services would randomly fail, and it was not clear if this was a problem with the test or if there was a genuine defect. The deeper I looked, the more the complexity around the test-suite freaked me out. It was using an in-house framework, which had evolved over years and the test depended on code in multiple files scattered across the workspace. It was clear that many programmers had attempted to fix it over the years. It was next to impossible to understand what the test was doing. There had to be a better way to express web-service functional tests, and I started thinking hard about it.

    This gave birth to Karate, a scriptable framework combining API and UI test automation. It has seen world wide adoption as an open-source project, including 37 of the Fortune 500 companies (so far!). Companies that have written about how they use Karate include Walmart [1], Expedia [2], Adobe [3], Trivago [4], and Oktana [5].

    Karate has its own Domain Specific Language, focused on writing tests with less code and in less time. This results in easy-to-read, maintainable tests, which are often simple enough for product owners to be able to contribute to. Karate also has powerful assertions ( ), runs tests in parallel, and can reuse API tests as performance tests, which saves time compared to rewriting performance tests using a second tool. The UI automation space is crowded, but there are very few tools that do all three: API, UI and performance testing.

    Last year, we decided to leave our day-jobs and work full-time on Karate. We incorporated Karate Labs as a for-profit company with an open-core business model in mind. In recent weeks, we've released our first two open-core products.

    Karate Studio can import Postman collections, Swagger, OpenAPI, HAR and cURL. Once imported, you can preview an API sequence and edit it using an intuitive no-code interface. You can then export it as a ready-to-run Karate feature file that you can integrate into your existing CI/CD or DevOps pipeline. If you already have a set of Postman collections, you can migrate them to Karate and get the benefits of parallel execution, powerful assertions and performance testing. If team members prefer Postman for exploratory testing, they can use Studio to convert their draft collections into full-fledged API automation suites, complete with assertions for complex business logic, and then use them in regression test suites. Studio can also export back to Postman if needed. It is available for a 7-day free trial at, and you can see a demo video here:

    Our second new product is an IntelliJ plugin ( that integrates the auto-complete experience and syntax hints that developers love. Until now, Karate support in IntelliJ was via the built-in Cucumber and Gherkin support, which was very basic. Teams have wished for a better option that would take advantage of all the Karate capabilities such as embedded JSON, JS and data assertions. Now you can write, debug, and maintain Karate tests even faster than before. The plugin is available from the JetBrains Marketplace with a 30-day free trial:

    When it comes to "build vs buy", many teams tend to build test automation frameworks. The fact that maintenance of an in-house framework eventually becomes prohibitive in terms of effort and cost, tends to be overlooked. We are trying to increase awareness that choosing a mature open-source framework like Karate is the right move for any team wanting to improve developer velocity.

    We thank the community, developers and enterprise users of Karate for having helped us achieve broad adoption and earn credibility in the test-automation domain. We look forward to your support, feedback and suggestions.


What are some alternatives?

When comparing museo and Karate you can also consider the following projects:

REST Assured - Java DSL for easy testing of REST services

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter open-source load testing tool for analyzing and measuring the performance of a variety of services

Cucumber - Cucumber for the JVM

WireMock - A tool for mocking HTTP services


MockServer - MockServer enables easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS with clients written in Java, JavaScript and Ruby. MockServer also includes a proxy that introspects all proxied traffic including encrypted SSL traffic and supports Port Forwarding, Web Proxying (i.e. HTTP proxy), HTTPS Tunneling Proxying (using HTTP CONNECT) and SOCKS Proxying (i.e. dynamic port forwarding).

Citrus - Framework for automated integration tests with focus on messaging integration

JUnit - A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java.

RabbitMQ-mock - Mock for RabbitMQ Java amqp-client

Testcontainers - Testcontainers is a Java library that supports JUnit tests, providing lightweight, throwaway instances of common databases, Selenium web browsers, or anything else that can run in a Docker container.

Pact JVM - JVM version of Pact. Enables consumer driven contract testing, providing a mock service and DSL for the consumer project, and interaction playback and verification for the service provider project.

Hoverfly Java - Java binding for Hoverfly