daam VS paint-with-words-sd

I did see this recently, where it can generate a heatmap of what an addition to a prompt changed in the image, but I haven't tried it yet, and that's not exactly much of an an explanation anyways

Paper: What the DAAM: Interpreting Stable Diffusion Using Cross Attention (arXiv paper, codebase)

Found relevant code at https://github.com/castorini/daam + all code implementations here

I am refering to this btw: https://github.com/cloneofsimo/paint-with-words-sd

This essentially supercharges the Nvidia eDiffi / SD paint-with-words attempts done for the same thing previously.

There is stable diffusion paint with words GitHub which probably does exactly this, but no UI ever: https://github.com/cloneofsimo/paint-with-words-sd

personally i want to see the ediffi paint w/words stable diffusion extension https://github.com/cloneofsimo/paint-with-words-sd/commit/789419e3a34f43a1454df5a940020cfa531fbc63 that clonesofimo was working on before he stopped

Just found there is a repo for an NVIDIA eDiff-I style img2img workflow for Stable Diffusion. For those unfamiliar, this lets you specify where parts of your text prompt should be placed in the image giving you much greater control on the composition e.g.

Paint-with-Words might eventually allow something along those lines, but it's a bit awkward to use now, and AFAIK you still get bleedthrough between multiple human subjects.

someone attempted something like paint with words but I think Nvidia's version is better looking.