cve-2021-3449 vs httpd

Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

www.influxdata.com

featured

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews

SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

www.saashub.com

featured

cve-2021-3449		httpd
	Project
4	Mentions	2
225	Stars	301
-	Growth	2.0%
0.0	Activity	4.6
over 2 years ago	Latest Commit	9 days ago
Go	Language	Dockerfile
-	License	Apache License 2.0

The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

cve-2021-3449

Posts with mentions or reviews of cve-2021-3449. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-25.

CVE 2021 3449 exploit method
1 project | /r/PenetrationTesting | 28 Mar 2021

I am trying to understand how to use the information in https://github.com/terorie/cve-2021-3449 to check in my server which has UI and supports TLS 1.2. It does not support renegotiation though but I still wanted to check with exploit to verify whether or not, it is impacted. The link mentions “go run . -host host:port” but I am not able to figure out how to use it as there seem no script to run. Any help would be appreciated.
CVE-2021-3499 OpenSSL denial-of-service PoC
1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Mar 2021
Do these vulns affect Fortigate devices? CVE-2021-3449 - CVE-2021-3450
1 project | /r/fortinet | 25 Mar 2021

FortiOS(web gui/sslvpn) is "vulnerable" to CVE-2021-3449, tested using POC https://github.com/terorie/cve-2021-3449 Impact is basically limited to filling up your crashlog, but if you have fortigates your used to that :)
OpenSSL Security Advisory [25 March 2021]
4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Mar 2021

Does anyone have a PoC? Someone posted this on Github but the git log is squashed and doesn't show the changes they made. https://github.com/terorie/cve-2021-3449

httpd

Posts with mentions or reviews of httpd. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-09.

Hack: Forcing Puppet to apt update
4 projects | dev.to | 9 Apr 2021

Short hack: As seen in m a n y Dockerfiles, the apt cache is located at /var/lib/apt/lists.
OpenSSL Security Advisory [25 March 2021]
4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Mar 2021

You can try configuring SSLOptions -OptRenegotiate and then point ssllabs at it to see if reneg is disabled.
If that doesn't work, recompile apache against an older version of openssl. Maybe the easiest way to do that is take the Dockerfile (https://github.com/docker-library/httpd/blob/master/2.4/Dock...), take out libssl-dev, compile a specific openssl version, then link against it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cve-2021-3449 and httpd you can also consider the following projects:

Caddy - Fast and extensible multi-platform HTTP/1-2-3 web server with automatic HTTPS

docker-nginx - Official NGINX Dockerfiles

stunner - Stunner is a tool to test and exploit STUN, TURN and TURN over TCP servers.

OpenSSL - TLS/SSL and crypto library

postgres - Docker Official Image packaging for Postgres

hershell - Multiplatform reverse shell generator

mkcert - A simple zero-config tool to make locally trusted development certificates with any names you'd like.

traitor - :arrow_up: :skull_and_crossbones: :fire: Automatic Linux privesc via exploitation of low-hanging fruit e.g. gtfobins, pwnkit, dirty pipe, +w docker.sock