cuezel VS Dagger2

I played with a similar idea a while ago: https://github.com/ecordell/cuezel/ (cuezel as in: "Bazel but with CUE"), but I was never sure that what I was doing was in the spirit of CUE.

CUE pushes nondeterminism into "_tool.cue"[0] files that are allowed to do things like IO and run external processes. Tool files scratch a similar itch to Makefiles, but they lack an integrated plugin system like Bazel (hence why I played with the idea of CUE + Bazel).

With Dagger you seem to be restricted to the set of things that the dagger tool can interpret just with like my Cuezel tool you are limited to what I happened to implement.

In CUE `_tool` files you are also limited to the set of things that the tool builtins provide, but the difference is that you know that the rest of the CUE program is deterministic/pure (everything not in a _tool file).

There's clearly value in tooling that reads CUE definitions, and dagger is the first commercial interest in CUE that I've seen, which is exciting.

But I'm most interested in some CUE-interpreter meta-tool that would allow you to import cue definitions + their interpreters and version them together, but for use in `_tool` files to keep the delineation clear. Maybe this is where dagger is heading? (if so it wasn't clear from the docs)

[0]: https://pkg.go.dev/cuelang.org/[email protected]/pkg/tool

There used to be a thing called "releasable references" which was that. It was removed, though: https://github.com/google/dagger/issues/1117

As said in the title, we will focus on the dependency inversion principle and one of its application : dependency injection. For production-ready applications, it would be better to rely on a framework and not implement its own container. For it, the java ecosystem have 3 frameworks available : Spring, Guice and Dagger.

At Reddit, we use Dagger 2 for handling dependency injection (DI) in our Android application. As we’ve scaled the application over the years, we’ve accrued a bit of technical debt in how we have approached this problem.

Confusing. I initially thought someone ported the Dagger DI framework to Python: https://dagger.dev/

I'm currently using Dagger and Anvil for my DI needs. It's been working really well, especially around what Anvil permits in terms of multibindings defined on the type declaration rather than in a module. For example:

Great job, I have been waiting for this feature/fix for a long time https://github.com/google/dagger/issues/2328

Dagger