csslint VS Cycle.js

CSS Lint

With that being said, you could run some css linter I believe if you really decided to let them to do. Maybe leverage something like this: https://github.com/CSSLint/csslint

http://csslint.net/ ?

Thanks in advance folks, if anyone would like to see any info or pics or whatever, I can post. If I haven't gone mad or blind from going thru too many lines of code. (it's hard to use things like CSSLint because of all the !importants you have to use to supercede stuff, and csslint.net flags every --variable-name as an error, so even after switching off everything but basic checking it doesnt work too well, not catching simple syntax errors even... maybe I should look into something better there)

VSCode can do real-time linting for you, or you can run it through an online linter.

Sorry, meant http://csslint.net - edited to change.

Second, check to make sure you didn't make a change to your CSS which broke all of the CSS after that point. You could use a site like CSS Lint to help check that for you (just copy-and-paste all of your CSS there and click "Lint").

You can use a linting site, such as http://csslint.net/, to check for syntax & redundancy errors before you save them to your sub's stylesheet.

Also you could look into linting your css (http://csslint.net/) This will force consistency in the way you write and catch mistakes

You might want to run your CSS code through a CSS error checker, like CSS Lint, to help you find errors like that. (Note: It's very picky, so you may get lots of warnings that you may be able to ignore, but you should definitely fix any errors.)

Seems like you might be interested in this

Cycle

This is the standard way of going about things in Mithril and Cycle. Elm as well doesn't use an XML knockoff for view code- and as a fun fact, the original version of React didn't either.

For example, an FRP framework (created by the same author who later wrote the callbag spec): https://cycle.js.org/

TypeScript is relatively mainstream at this point, and I think that's good news. If you want to crank the type-safety and pure FP dials on it to 11, you certainly can do that. I have a project that I've based largely on this post, including the "hardcore" section. However, instead of Redux and otherwise plain React, I've chosen to use Cycle.js and the lessons from this post to use React in a very purely Functional Reactive Programming Way.

This post links to a PureScript project that is probably the easiest PS framework around.

ReScript + rescript-react is a good alternative. Less safe, waaaay more verbose; but backed by Facebook.

This is quite cute (in TypeScript though): https://github.com/cyclejs/cyclejs

And Yew is super cool, it goes the WASM route (in Rust): https://github.com/yewstack/yew

From now on I was on what I would call a typical open source trajectory. I used the Cycle.js framework to rewrite my frontend and in that process I hit some walls. I eventually figured that the error was on my side and that I was just missing some information to avoid the error. To spare others the hours of debugging I started to contribute small patches to the documentation. At the same time I also found some missing features that I voiced in GitHub issues.