css-turing-machine VS ArnoldC

> Technically html + css + user interaction can be turing complete: https://github.com/brandondong/css-turing-machine

Turing completeness is about what computations can be expressed, not what user interactions can be performed. The lambda calculus is Turing complete, but, if I whip up a lambda calculus interpreter and don't give it a print statement, then you'll never know anything about the computations it's performing.

Allow css in there and you get this

Seems like regex is not turing complete, bit its not a programming langauge ether. I thought i remembered that it was, i listed as one of the joke langauges as i know someome showed that PowerPoint is turing complete, but i think i mixed up regex and CSS here(that again is not a programming langauge but is in fact turing complete: https://github.com/brandondong/css-turing-machine)

It is definetly a borderline case (because of the need for clicking) , but html + css combined can be used to simulate the rule 110 automaton. Therefore it is possible to simulate a turing machine which means that it is in fact turing complete.

I understand CSS and I've done a fair bit of webdesign myself. CSS has evolved to the point where it can be used abusively. Hell some consider it turing complete (https://github.com/brandondong/css-turing-machine). From ads, to fingerprinting, to exploits there are valid reasons for wanting a little less functionality while still allowing for some basic styling. I mean, it's cool that there are computer games written in pure CSS and other neat tricks, but sometimes you just want a browser to behave itself even in hostile spaces. If that makes my locked down browser a "horse drawn cart" I'm happy to trot forward.

Yeah, someone even made a basic Turing machine to demonstrate it. As u/sext-scientist said, you have to click a button to perform each operation, but technically this means that you could write any program using HTML+CSS. Though the user might need an autoclicker to run even a "Hello World" program.

Like ArnoldC but based on different character. Maybe Michael Scott or Leslie Knope

No, write it in ArnoldC: https://lhartikk.github.io/ArnoldC/

The family cannot be complete without ArnoldC

Gotta love goofy stunts that take effort to make! A spiritually similar programming language that also screams a lot is ArnoldC: https://lhartikk.github.io/ArnoldC/

Ovaj

I would use a light and simple language

We all know that this is a silly argument because Arnold C is objectively the best language for any and all use-cases. Opting to use something else is a decision made exclusively due to poor judgement.