csf-post-docker VS docker-fail2ban

Compare csf-post-docker vs docker-fail2ban and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
csf-post-docker docker-fail2ban
1 9
53 608
- -
0.0 6.5
almost 2 years ago 6 days ago
Shell Dockerfile
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

csf-post-docker

Posts with mentions or reviews of csf-post-docker. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Csf And Docker
    1 project | /r/linuxadmin | 2 Jan 2021
    Found a solution. This script makes it work perfectly, but for me only together with adding the full path to the docker and iptables commands in it. No need for docker restarts anymore.

docker-fail2ban

Posts with mentions or reviews of docker-fail2ban. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-09.
  • How to secure my self-hosted website?
    2 projects | /r/selfhosted | 9 Feb 2023
    It does, but it defaults to nftables from (I think) Ubuntu 21 and onwards. So when you're running fail2ban in a docker container, it run an iptables command to block the IP. However, it errors out because nftables is default in Ubuntu 19 onwards (only for new installs). See https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-fail2ban down the page. You can replace the defaults, but I do not want to mess with my docker box at this point!
  • Newbie looking to get a NAS
    2 projects | /r/qnap | 24 Oct 2022
    Nginx Reverse Proxy Manager Lets you redirect traffic from a single machine to all of your VMs and servers as well as manage SSL certificates, you can also do things like deploy Fail2Ban
  • Help securing/exposing self-hosted services
    4 projects | /r/selfhosted | 1 Oct 2022
  • A working regex for the fallback_access.log in nginx proxy manager
    2 projects | /r/nginxproxymanager | 21 Dec 2021
    My setup is all docker on the raspberry pi 4 8gb. I can not seem to find a good regex for this log file. All log entries fail when testing. You wish it will put the client entry IP address in iptables. My regex knowledge is zero so I depend on examples (that don't work). I have no problems with the configuration that works fine. The proxy xx access log has a different format, but if someone has a working regex for that file, please let me know. For fail2ban I use https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-fail2ban For NPM I use https://github.com/jc21/nginx-proxy-manager In fail2ban I use the filter.d dir for the conf file. I can see it's loading in the log but the testing from within the docker image gives no result.
  • Possible to redirect container logs to file
    3 projects | /r/docker | 6 Dec 2021
    My setup right now includes - Rootless Docker (can read and maybe write to journald, syslog seems to require root but maybe I'm wrong) - Fail2ban in a container crazymax/fail2ban
  • Was my raspberry hacked?
    4 projects | /r/linuxadmin | 29 Oct 2021
    If you are running docker for your stuff, crazy-max dockerized fail2ban works well. Just be sure to export any form of logs out of what you want to protect and into the fail2ban container.
  • fail2ban for reverse proxy inside docker
    1 project | /r/selfhosted | 31 Aug 2021
    You can use the following docker image to spawn an instance of fail2ban: https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-fail2ban
  • Is putting fail2ban/ufw in front of Docker+Traefik v2 necessary? How do Docker+Traefik handle the same need?
    2 projects | /r/Traefik | 21 Jan 2021
    https://github.com/crazy-max/docker-fail2ban#custom-jails-actions-and-filters

What are some alternatives?

When comparing csf-post-docker and docker-fail2ban you can also consider the following projects:

ufw-docker - To fix the Docker and UFW security flaw without disabling iptables

crowdsec - CrowdSec - the open-source and participative security solution offering crowdsourced protection against malicious IPs and access to the most advanced real-world CTI.

iptables-docker - A bash solution for docker and iptables conflict

docker-php-nginx - Docker image with PHP-FPM 8.3 & Nginx 1.24 on Alpine Linux

iptables-nftables-multiroute-firewall - A collection of nftables, multi routing scripts, port knocked, and iptables files. To get inspiration to make your own firewalls.

docker-rtorrent-rutorrent - rTorrent and ruTorrent Docker image

firehol - A firewall for humans...

docker-cloudflared - Cloudflared proxy-dns Docker image

docker-host - A docker sidecar container to forward all traffic to local docker host or any other host

docker-matomo - Matomo (formerly Piwik) Docker image

AnonAddy-docker - AnonAddy Docker image

dockprom - Docker hosts and containers monitoring with Prometheus, Grafana, cAdvisor, NodeExporter and AlertManager