cri-o
enhancements
cri-o | enhancements | |
---|---|---|
33 | 58 | |
5,028 | 3,270 | |
0.6% | 1.1% | |
9.8 | 9.7 | |
about 6 hours ago | 2 days ago | |
Go | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cri-o
-
The Road To Kubernetes: How Older Technologies Add Up
Kubernetes on the backend used to utilize docker for much of its container runtime solutions. One of the modular features of Kubernetes is the ability to utilize a Container Runtime Interface or CRI. The problem was that Docker didn't really meet the spec properly and they had to maintain a shim to translate properly. Instead users could utilize the popular containerd or cri-o runtimes. These follow the Open Container Initiative or OCI's guidelines on container formats.
-
Complexity by Simplicity - A Deep Dive Into Kubernetes Components
Multiple container runtimes are supported, like conatinerd, cri-o, or other CRI compliant runtimes.
-
Kubernetes Cluster Setup Using Kubeadm on AWS
Install container runtime on all nodes. We will use cri-o.
-
Creating Kubernetes Cluster With CRI-O
Container Runtime Interface (CRI) is one of the important parts of the Kubernetes cluster. It is a plugin interface allowing kubelet to use different container runtimes. And recently CRI-O container runtime has been announced as a CNCF Graduated project. I thought of writing a blog on CRI-O and how to set up a single-node Kubernetes cluster with Kubeadm and CRI-O.
- 32“ E Ink screen that displays daily newspapers on your wall
-
Understanding Docker Architecture: A Beginner's Guide to How Docker Works
CRI-O: This is an open-source container runtime designed for use with Kubernetes. It is a lightweight and stable environment for containers. It also complies with the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI), making it easy to integrate with Kubernetes.
-
How are they doing it?
With CRI-O I believe you can configure registry mirror locations…. Similar to this: https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/issues/4941
-
Docker is deleting Open Source organisations - what you need to know
Alternatives like Podman and CRI-O continue to gain traction and may replace Docker in various places. For example, Kubernetes used to use Docker, then moved to containerd, and now also support CRI-O. Generally speaking, the core features of "Docker" are such a commodity now that no one was the wiser when Kubernetes stopped using it.
-
kubeadm init error: CRI v1 runtime API is not implemented
will the site be available for the CKA exam? https://github.com/cri-o/cri-o/blob/main/install.md
-
Container Deep Dive 2: Container Engines
The CRI-O container engine provides a stable, more secure, and performant platform for running Open Container Initiative (OCI) compatible runtimes. CRI-Os purpose is to be the container engine that implements the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI) for OpenShift Container Platform and Kubernetes, replacing the Docker service. Source
enhancements
-
IBM to buy HashiCorp in $6.4B deal
> was always told early on that although they supported vault on kubernetes via a helm chart, they did not recommend using it on anything but EC2 instances (because of "security" which never really made sense their reasoning).
The reasoning is basically that there are some security and isolation guarantees you don't get in Kubernetes that you do get on bare metal or (to a somewhat lesser extent) in VMs.
In particular for Kubernetes, Vault wants to run as a non-root user and set the IPC_LOCK capability when it starts to prevent its memory from being swapped to disk. While in Docker you can directly enable this by adding capabilities when you launch the container, Kubernetes has an issue because of the way it handles non-root container users specified in a pod manifest, detailed in a (long-dormant) KEP: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/... (tl;dr: Kubernetes runs the container process as root, with the specified capabilities added, but then switches it to the non-root UID, which causes the explicitly-added capabilities to be dropped).
You can work around this by rebuilding the container and setting the capability directly on the binary, but the upstream build of the binary and the one in the container image don't come with that set (because the user should set it at runtime if running the container image directly, and the systemd unit sets it via systemd if running as a systemd service, so there's no need to do that except for working around Kubernetes' ambient-capability issue).
> It always surprised me how these conversations went. "Well we don't really recommend kubernetes so we won't support (feature)."
-
Exploring cgroups v2 and MemoryQoS With EKS and Bottlerocket
0 is not the request we've defined. And that makes sense. Memory QoS has been in alpha since Kubernetes 1.22 (August 2021) and according to the KEP data was still in alpha as of 1.27.
-
Jenkins Agents On Kubernetes
Note: There's actually a Structured Authentication Config established via KEP-3331. It's in v1.28 as a feature flag gated option and removes the limitation of only having one OIDC provider. I may look into doing an article on it, but for now I'll deal with the issue in a manner that should work even with a bit older versions versions of Kubernetes.
-
Isint release cycle becoming a bit crazy with monthly releases and deprecations ?
Kubernetes supports a skew policy of n+2 between API server and kubelet. This means if your CP and DP are both on 1.20, you could upgrade your control plane twice (1.20 -> 1.21 -> 1.22) before you need to upgrade your data plane. And when it comes time to upgrade your data plane you can jump from 1.20 to 1.22 to minimize update churn. In the future, this skew will be opened to n+3 https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-architecture/3935-oldest-node-newest-control-plane
-
Kubernetes SidecarContainers feature is merged
The KEP (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal) is linked to in the PR [1]. From the summary:
> Sidecar containers are a new type of containers that start among the Init containers, run through the lifecycle of the Pod and don’t block pod termination. Kubelet makes a best effort to keep them alive and running while other containers are running.
[1] https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/...
-
What's there in K8s 1.27
This is where the new feature of mutable scheduling directives for jobs comes into play. This feature enables the updating of a job's scheduling directives before it begins. Essentially, it allows custom queue controllers to influence pod placement without needing to directly handle the assignment of pods to nodes themselves. To learn more about this check out the Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal 2926.
-
Dependencies between Services
What your asking is a (vanilla) Kubernetes non-goal, others have mentioned fluxcd and other add ons that provide primitives for dependency aware deployments. The problem space is so large, that it's unreasonable to to address these concerns in Kubernetes itself, instead, make it extensible... Look at this KEP for example: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/753 Sidecar containers have existed, and been named as such since WAY before that KEP's inception, defining what these things should and shouldn't do is largely arbitrary. Aka: your use-case is niche, if you don't like the behavior, use flux or argo, or write something yourself.
- When you learn the Sidecar Container KEP got dropped from the Kubernets release. Again.
-
Kubernetes 1.27 will be out next week! - Learn what's new and what's deprecated - Group volume snapshots - Pod resource updates - kubectl subcommands … And more!
If further interested, I may recommend checking out the KEP. I love how they document the decision making, and all these edge cases :).
-
How can I force assign an IP to my Load Balancer ingress in “status.loadBalancer”?
See https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/kubectl/conventions/#subresources and https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/2590
What are some alternatives?
containerd - An open and reliable container runtime
kubeconform - A FAST Kubernetes manifests validator, with support for Custom Resources!
crun - A fast and lightweight fully featured OCI runtime and C library for running containers
spark-operator - Kubernetes operator for managing the lifecycle of Apache Spark applications on Kubernetes.
k3s - Lightweight Kubernetes
kubernetes-json-schema - Schemas for every version of every object in every version of Kubernetes
minikube - Run Kubernetes locally
klipper-lb - Embedded service load balancer in Klipper
cri-dockerd - dockerd as a compliant Container Runtime Interface for Kubernetes
Hey - HTTP load generator, ApacheBench (ab) replacement
kaniko - Build Container Images In Kubernetes
connaisseur - An admission controller that integrates Container Image Signature Verification into a Kubernetes cluster