create-react-library VS eslint-plugin-react

At first i thought that this was THE solution but looking deeper at the source code, this tool is a wrapper around a wrapper around a wrapper.... Don't get me wrong, it probably works, but it's currently using a rollup configuration that was created in 2018, the package itself has not seen any updates in 17 months and has 106 open issues. Also the owner says himself that he's not able to work that much on it anymore and suggest to use TSDX which in return hasn't been updated in several months, many open issues and extensive customization is recommended with patch-package which already in itself is a red-flag :(

create-react-library - CLI for creating reusable, modern React libraries using Rollup and create-react-app.

Using create-react-library to scaffold a React component library.

create-react-library

Just found this: https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/create-react-library

JavaScript Standard Style is less opinionated about JSX formatting and largely leaves JSX as-is. In a React project, you should integrate with React-specific linting rules for ESLint. The generally accepted configurations are eslint-plugin-react and eslint-plugin-react-hooks, enforcing some best practices of writing React code.

> [1] https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/maste...

From what I remember, being able to pass children as a prop is considered a side-effect of an implementation detail, that breaks the expected abstraction. There really isn't any reason to use it, and I think there's a chance it may even confuse the virtual dom diffing?

Also this would prevent you from accidentally doing both at once:

  Is it me?}>

I try to focus on the issues rather than individuals, but the root of the problems in the listed eslint plugin libraries points to ljharb.

If you do some simple digging into these libraries, you will find that these types of commits are quite common within them.

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/commit/e1d...

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/jsx-ast-utils/commit/bad51d062...

https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y/commit/...

He would rather see the download count of these polyfill libraries https://github.com/ljharb/ljharb#projects-i-maintain increase, compared to assessing the health of the JavaScript ecosystem.

An obvious pick for React projects, but eslint-plugin-react along with their plugin:react/recommended rule set is a must. This will give you some sensible rules such as requiring a key to be specified in JSX arrays. eslint-config-airbnb is another good (if a bit loose) base rule set on top of eslint-plugin-react to start from.

If you already have the eslint-plugin-react installed, you can enable the following rule.

You can also add ESLint now (props to @femincan for the suggestion). It comes with recommended settings for these plugins: typescript, prettier, react, react-hooks, jsx-a11y.

Also for what it’s worth, there’s a React ESLint code rule that can enforce this behavior either way for Component props - I’m not in front of a code base atm, but I wonder if my preference for the syntax above is influenced by a popular linting preset like AirBnB which enforces this rule? https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/master/docs/rules/jsx-curly-brace-presence.md

The missing piece is on this page, in a small note at the end of the page: the eslint rule to disallow missing React when using JSX.

Thanks for weighing in, that's good to know. After wondering if this could be auto-refactored, I came across https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react/blob/maste..., will definitely have to give that (with `--fix`) a try in the new year and see if I can get the team on board! – desire for typescript being a compelling factor.

Personally I do like the non-destructured `props.abc` throughout component code, really helps clarify at a glance where something is coming from, whether it's locally or externally defined, etc. Code style is an endless exercise in compromises/opinions though, even _with_ tools like eslint and prettier.