cppreference-doc VS etl

C++ reference websites, such as cplusplus.com and cppreference.com.

A couple tips: * To look up info about the C++ language and standard libraries, cppreference is fantastic. * The godbolt compiler explorer is very cool for investigating "is this code legal" and "what assembly does this compile to" type questions.

Learn as much of the stl as possible (https://en.cppreference.com/)

Actually, en.cppreference.com/ is OK. I often lookup here every time I write C++.

https://en.cppreference.com/ as a web app, i can never win, im never good enough

Why not just en.cppreference.com ?

If you can't use the STL because of exceptions: https://www.etlcpp.com/

You can also use ETL (https://www.etlcpp.com)

Use ETL for embedded standard library functionality: https://www.etlcpp.com/

The best choice here is use embedded Template Library: https://www.etlcpp.com/

If you can't get C++23, expected it's implemented in the ETL (it's also just a really amazing library for this kind of stuff - highly recommend!).

I want to use some of C++ std library classes/functions in my embedded system library project that I'm writing. However as the environment has limited ressources I don't want to have use or expose classes or functions that do the following: * Dynamic memory allocations * RTTI * Runtime exceptions I will be rewriting some basic container and algorithms according to my needs. I know that there are other re writes of STL like ESTL but I don't want to have any external dependencies So my question is can I somehow compile/package a fork of C++ std library that only include embedded systems friendly classes such as: - array - tuple - variant - type_traits Etc This compiled library must be completely standalone. The compiler that I use can support upto C++17 standard.

I will never not recommend the Embedded Template Library

STL containers use dynamic memory allocation which is often a no-no in embedded contexts. there is the ETL https://www.etlcpp.com/ but I haven't used it!