cpp-docs VS PushLock

Compare cpp-docs vs PushLock and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
cpp-docs PushLock
12 1
1,397 3
1.2% -
9.9 5.9
7 days ago 2 months ago
PowerShell C++
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

cpp-docs

Posts with mentions or reviews of cpp-docs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-03.

PushLock

Posts with mentions or reviews of PushLock. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-03.
  • Bug in std:shared_mutex on Windows
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Mar 2024
    https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/1b55686/comment/ktfggu...

    if say true - i here in very strange position. i am by self under debugger research exacly what happens in concrete case and create repro code. i think that implementation of the RtlReleaseSRWLockExclusive is not the best and may be really containing "bug" as i in more details describe in comment on reddit. but from another side, if you want pure formal c++ rules - can you explain - in what exactly was bug in concre case ? what rule/guarantee is violated ? why demo code decide that ALL shared waiters can at once acquire the lock. formal documentation not state this. this intuitive must be true, because no exclusive request more. but.. i really dont know. and i also for fun create own implementation of SRW lock ( if someone interested to look -https://github.com/rbmm/PushLock ) which free from this roblem - i always ( hope) do only single atomic change to lock state during api call. and finally - sorry for my english and too long answer

What are some alternatives?

When comparing cpp-docs and PushLock you can also consider the following projects:

AStarDemo - A basic A* example ported to C++/WinRT

emails - emails I received

ppm2png - Basic command line utility to convert PPM images (P3) into PNG

SRW-2 - shared to exclusive

ifc-spec - IFC format specification

wireguard-android - Mirror only. Official repository is at https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-android

refterm - Reference monospace terminal renderer

zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.

dll_to_exe - Converts a DLL into EXE

mobile - [mirror] Go on Mobile

bitsandbytes-prebuilt-all_arch - A repository containing prebuilt versions of the bitsandbytes library for Windows

bitsandbytes-prebuilt-all