coverlet
CodeCoverageSummary
Our great sponsors
| coverlet | CodeCoverageSummary | |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 1 | |
| 2,899 | 167 | |
| 1.2% | - | |
| 8.2 | 0.0 | |
| 7 days ago | 4 days ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
coverlet
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
You might have noticed when you were looking in NuGet, there was a package called coverlet installed into the project:
-
Do you use any code coverage tool on your project?
There are a lot libraries to collect code coverage, one of this one is Coverlet: https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet
-
Code Coverage for Build Server without Visual Studio Enterprise
We use Coverlet. You have to do some work to get it working with your tests but I have no complaints. I don't know for sure if it works with VS Community, but since it plugs into MSBuild I'm not sure how it could be gated to that.
-
How to define the same folder for merging test coverage?
And I would like to build a total test coverage for the solution. So, I added coverlet.msbuild to the dependencies and executed the next command from the examples of coverlet
-
Analyzing and enforcing .NET code coverage with coverlet
CoverletOutputFormat: The format of the report that coverlet will generate (opencover, cobertura, json). More here;
- Code coverage and warnings for modified files only
-
Generating Code Coverage Metrics for .NET Framework Applications
Utilize Coverletand Report Generator utilities – however, this is where its funny, because these are .NET CLI tools that need the .NET 6 SDK installed.
-
Code coverage for Asp.net 6 web APIs
Coverlet works really well.
-
Why does VSTest put the output of data collectors to GUIDed subdirectories?
However, I am hesitant to do so. Whenever it seems I have to fight the tools that are provided for me this is a likely sign that I’m Doing Things Wrong because of some fundamental misunderstandings and misassumptions on my part. I did some digging and found that VSTest by design forces the placement of data collectors’ output into GUIDed subdirectories, see Coverlet documentation, Coverlet issue #500 and VSTest issue #2378. That this is forced by design reinforces my worries that I’m doing something counterproductive.
-
Code Coverage Tool For XUnit
Coverlet
CodeCoverageSummary
-
IPPCCR - In Pursuit of Perfect Code Coverage [Reporting]
Additionally, PRs to the project should get a comment like the below from the CodeCoverageSummary Github Action
What are some alternatives?
ReportGenerator - ReportGenerator converts coverage reports generated by coverlet, OpenCover, dotCover, Visual Studio, NCover, Cobertura, JaCoCo, Clover, gcov or lcov into human readable reports in various formats.
very_good_coverage - GitHub Action which helps enforce code coverage threshold using lcov created by Very Good Ventures 🦄
Cobertura - Cobertura
RunCoverletReport - A Visual Studio 2019 Extension to run Coverlet and Report Generator
Fine Code Coverage - Visualize unit test code coverage easily for free in Visual Studio Community Edition (and other editions too)
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
gitmoji-regex - 🔥 A regular expression matching Gitmoji (a subset of Unicode Emoji) symbols
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
coverlet - Cross platform code coverage for .NET [Moved to: https://github.com/coverlet-coverage/coverlet]
NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
Faultify - Byte Code Dotnet Mutation Utility