counterfeiter VS integresql

then just replace whole function, don't generate manually the mock '__') or it would get out of hand fast, you can just use codegen that static typed like https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

Yes, that's a good way to do that; there are a lot of packages that allow you to mock and spy the calls if you're looking for one that generates the code for you I can recommend counterfeiter, I also have a short blog that covers it.

I prefer https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

counterfeiter is another tool, it creates mocks, stubs and spies; here is a short blog I wrote covering it.

for dependency injection I suggest you use https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter, but if you using really fast database (that can spawn fast using docker and has fast trx/sec) you can use it directly without dependency injection with https://github.com/ory/dockertest

Agree with u/mmknightx there is a tool that assist in creating fake or mock classes for your interfaces https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

Another alternative to use would be counterfeiter, it generates a type from your interface that could be used as a mock, stub or spy. I wrote a short post covering that tool if you're interested.

For the case of PostgreSQL I've found IntegreSQL and its Javascript client really helpful because it can create a copy of the database per test case, which it helps to write integration tests with real DB calls.

Mocking has some advantages, but so does using a real database, at work we use https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql and I quite like the approach that integresql has, since it makes possible to have a fresh database with your dummy data for every test without impacting the execution speed (compared to dropping an re-creating the database).

Happy to hear that! When it comes to testing services that depend on PostgreSQL, this is still my preferred solution.

https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql

disclaimer: author

I haven't had a change to try it yet, but IntegreSQL[0] looks like this on steroids. It allows you to create a template (runs migrations and seed dates), and then uses Postgres's built in cloning functionality to maintain a pool of fresh databases. They claim 500ms to clone a database without the pool, and that the pool pretty much hides the latency entirely.

[0]: https://github.com/allaboutapps/integresql