counterfeiter VS autogold

then just replace whole function, don't generate manually the mock '__') or it would get out of hand fast, you can just use codegen that static typed like https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

Yes, that's a good way to do that; there are a lot of packages that allow you to mock and spy the calls if you're looking for one that generates the code for you I can recommend counterfeiter, I also have a short blog that covers it.

I prefer https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

counterfeiter is another tool, it creates mocks, stubs and spies; here is a short blog I wrote covering it.

for dependency injection I suggest you use https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter, but if you using really fast database (that can spawn fast using docker and has fast trx/sec) you can use it directly without dependency injection with https://github.com/ory/dockertest

Agree with u/mmknightx there is a tool that assist in creating fake or mock classes for your interfaces https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter

Another alternative to use would be counterfeiter, it generates a type from your interface that could be used as a mock, stub or spy. I wrote a short post covering that tool if you're interested.

I use autogold for my tests now, and I use the -update feature already twice. That's really handy.

https://github.com/hexops/autogold - generate and update test result (go test -update .)

this way, you can switch around framework easily without changing the business logic, and all business logic easily testable without thinking about serialization at all (just matching the input struct and output struct, for example using https://github.com/hexops/autogold)

prefer these two tools: https://github.com/maxbrunsfeld/counterfeiter and https://github.com/hexops/autogold

There is a small issue with string-pointers and inline-updating autogold.Want calls, can you have a look? https://github.com/hexops/autogold/issues/4