CoreDNS VS BorgBackup

CoreDNS supports this via the bind plugin.

I'd like to use Cloudflare's 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 nameservers in Kubernetes, alongside DNS over TLS. It looks like I can do it using core-dns. I need to setup the following somehow:

Shamless plug for CoreDNS. Much better DNS server than classic bind9. And of course there's already a nice container image for it.

But another approach that could work in Kubernetes, because the DNS servers are within the cluster itself, would be to work directly with the DNS server pods. In most Kubernetes clusters, whether standalone or managed (GKE, AKS, EKS), the cluster DNS is either coredns or kube-dns. That was great to minimize how much configuration options we’d need to support. We realized we could edit the coredns or kube-dns configmap resources to enable their log option, which would make them log all the queries they handle. We’ll cover exactly how it’s done in more detail below.

CoreDNS has an ectd plugin, so your service could add entries to a database, which is used as record source. Not the same mechanism as you have described, but it will get the job done. Also this is what Kubetnetes does for incluster dns records.

nevermind there's caddy builtin upgrade method https://github.com/coredns/coredns/issues/6034

Coredns can be spun up in a docker container, just starting to get into it myself

CoreDNS is a pretty good DNS server.

Core DNS (https://coredns.io).

i use - and recommend - "borgbackup": for example with the "vorta" graphical frontend

* https://www.borgbackup.org/

* https://vorta.borgbase.com/install/windows/

just my 0.02€

I used this many, many years ago but switched to Borg[0] about five years ago. Duplicity required full backups with incremental deltas, which meant my backups ended up using too much disk space. Borg lets you prune older backups at will, because of chunk tracking and deduplication there is no such thing as an incremental backup.

[0] https://www.borgbackup.org/

Currently, I'm auto-backing it up with borg (push mode) through wireguard tunnel to NAS behind ISP's CGNAT. The borg takes care of deduplication in SQL file, so incremental update (even in append-only mode) is very small for PostgreSQL dump.

Borg 2 has been in development for nearly a year and a half [1] and may probably be released early next year, i.e., early 2024 (just a guess, seeing that even RC1 is not yet released and seems to have a lot of work to be done).

Does anyone know how Borg 1.x and 2 would compare to Kopia?

[1]: https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/issues/6602

You could use borgbackup.