cordova-plugin-health
parcel
cordova-plugin-health | parcel | |
---|---|---|
2 | 170 | |
175 | 43,145 | |
- | 0.2% | |
8.9 | 9.4 | |
about 2 months ago | 2 days ago | |
Java | JavaScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cordova-plugin-health
-
Google Fit APIs get shut down in 2025, might break fitness devices
it's the same as healthkit basically. The fact that the 2 APIs are converging is good news for us programmers.
Disclaimer: I am the author of this https://github.com/dariosalvi78/cordova-plugin-health
-
Why some developers are avoiding app store headaches by going web-only
It depends on the complexity of the API you are trying to access. So for example one of the plugins is called cordova-plugin-health. This plugin does native on-device queries against iOS HealthKit and Google Fit on Android. As you can see from the many many forks this plugin doesn't really translate the data 1:1 into JavaScript land. It essentially is only a subset of the whole API so when you want to access the real thing you're talking about forking the plugin and maintaining your own version. So you're right that small mods can be made but it's sorta like forking a jquery plugin. Now it's your problem.
parcel
-
How and why do we bundle zx?
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution from a couple of among all available alternatives: esbuild and parcel. Esbuild won. Specifically in our case, it proved to be more productive and customizable.
-
DEMO - Voice to PDF - Complete PDF documents with voice commands using the Claude 3 Opus API
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
Homepage: https://parceljs.org/
-
React Server Components Example with Next.js
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs.
-
JS Toolbox 2024: Bundlers and Test Frameworks
Parcel 2 emphasizes a zero-configuration approach to bundling web applications. It's a powerful tool that offers a hassle-free developer experience, focusing on simplicity and speed.
-
Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them. Bun is vying for the spot of The New Hotness in bundling, Rome has been forked into Biome, and Vercel is building a Rust-based Webpack alternative.
-
What is JSDoc and why you may not need typescript for your next project?
Parcel
-
Building Node.js applications without dependencies
I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser.
Here's what I have found so far:
- JavaScript (vanilla) is a viable alternative to React.js
-
11 Ways to Optimize Your Website
Besides Webpack, there are many other popular web bundlers available, such as Parcel, Esbuild, Rollup, and more. They all have their own unique features and strengths, and you should make your decision based on the needs and requirements of your specific project. Please refer to their official websites for details.
-
Bun vs Node.js: Everything you need to know
In the Node.js ecosystem, bundling is typically handled by third-party tools rather than Node.js itself. Some of the most popular bundlers in the Node.js world include Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel, offering features like code splitting, tree shaking, and hot module replacement.
What are some alternatives?
buttplug-rs - Rust Implementation of the Buttplug Sex Toy Control Protocol
vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!
react-native-health - A React Native package to interact with Apple HealthKit
gulp - A toolkit to automate & enhance your workflow
QS-data-flow-network-graph
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
old-reddit-redirect - Ensure Reddit always loads the old design
Next.js - The React Framework
Flutter - Flutter makes it easy and fast to build beautiful apps for mobile and beyond
webpack - A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows for loading parts of the application on demand. Through "loaders", modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
proposals - Tracking WebAssembly proposals
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler