con-nf
A formal consistency proof of Quine's set theory New Foundations (by leanprover-community)
lean4checker
Replay the `Environment` for a given Lean module, ensuring that all declarations are accepted by the kernel. (by leanprover)
con-nf | lean4checker | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |
56 | 15 | |
- | - | |
9.6 | 7.3 | |
about 1 month ago | 26 days ago | |
Lean | Lean | |
- | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
con-nf
Posts with mentions or reviews of con-nf.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-23.
-
New Foundations is consistent – a difficult mathematical proof proved using Lean
But like, you can look at what parts of Mathlib this development imports, it's mainly stuff imported by files in this subdirectory https://github.com/leanprover-community/con-nf/tree/main/Con... , and it's pretty basic things: the definition of a permutation, a cardinal number etc. Almost all of these are things that would feature in the first one or two years of an undergraduate math degree (from just quickly scanning it, the most advanced thing I could see is the definition of cofinality of ordinals). It seems practically impossible to me that someone would make a mistake when e.g. defining what a group is, in a way subtle enough to later break this advanced theorem. If you think that people could mess up that, then all of math would be in doubt.
lean4checker
Posts with mentions or reviews of lean4checker.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-23.
-
New Foundations is consistent – a difficult mathematical proof proved using Lean
Note also that there is an independent checker https://github.com/leanprover/lean4checker to ensure that you're not pulling any fancy tricks at the code level: that the compiled output, free of tactics, is in fact a proof.