compress VS ozzo-validation

There's a pure-go zstd at https://github.com/klauspost/compress - it's likely faster than running the upstream zstd under Wazero.

It's no surprise that "fast" Go libraries are actually just assembly: https://github.com/klauspost/compress/blob/master/zstd/seqdec_amd64.s (just one file out of several, for just one architecture, for just one compression algorithm!)

There is a reasonably feature complete implementation of Zstd for Go: https://github.com/klauspost/compress/tree/master/zstd

It may not offer the same API 1:1, but it has no interoperability issues that I've encountered. So, I just think no one has bothered to implement it in Rust because most use cases don't mind the added bloat you're talking about. Plus, other comments I've seen suggest that you can actually tune the size of the zstd library, although I'm not sure if the Rust bindings expose that.

Thanks again for your review/comment!!! Btw, are you the author of this repo https://github.com/klauspost/compress because I love it!!!

I noticed Github returns "This page is taking too long to load" with status code 502 for https://github.com/klauspost/compress but rest of their urls works fine. Anyone know why would that be the case ?

Cloning the repo works perfectly well.

git clone https://github.com/klauspost/compress

Recent versions of zstd definitely don't obsolete LZ4, or else I don't think the author would still be contributing to both...

And if you're going to play with Snappy, you might find S2, which was linked on HN relatively recently, interesting. [1]

[1] - https://github.com/klauspost/compress/tree/master/s2

Compression method appears to be zstandard and uses https://github.com/klauspost/compress, for those wondering like I was.

OMG u/klauspost is this you? https://github.com/klauspost/compress/tree/master/s2

go-ozzo/ozzo-validation

https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation Seems to do what I need but likely will need some convoluted reflection to build out the rules. Also likely some custom rules to be written which is okay since it's a one time cost and reuse in the expressions.

Personally I use ozzo validation: https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation

This looks useful, but what differentiates it from something like https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation ? Why would I use Valgo over something battle tested that follows a very similar pattern?

This is where it gets spicy: I just don't get at all who ever though this struct-tag based validation library was a good idea https://github.com/go-playground/validator - and yet it's the most mainstream one. Try to implement your own type, you're up to register some global validation tag and repeat it every time you're using that type. I'm grateful https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation exists, that's what I use. But it's still way behind the other things I mention, where in general, it's simply not possible to pass around an invalid struct - because it can't be built if it's invalid in the first place.

Gin comes with built-in "validation", while Echo recommends the same validator. I am also not a fan of magic struct tags, so I would probably prefer either writing my own or using something like ozzo.

Other packages of note: https://github.com/uber-go/zap https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation

Does https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation meet your requirements?

https://github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation/blob/v3.6.0/struct.go#L61