compose-spec VS buildkit

Specification: https://compose-spec.io

https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/spe...

There are a number of incorrect statements in this post.

1) One should neither be using the "latest" nor just the "version" tag as the version can still vary depending on when it is pulled.

Instead, one should use a combination of version + hash, say alpine:3.18.2@sha256:82d1e9d7ed48a7523bdebc18cf6290bdb97b82302a8a9c27d4fe885949ea94d1 for reproducibility reasons. This provides for human readable versions as well as the specific hash.

2) Next, afaik, Compose has removed the need for version tags. All of the compose.yml files that I now use do not specify versions.

See https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/04-...

Docker Compose v2 specifications provide a useful Secrets feature which may also be used for standalone Compose Application Stacks and not just in Docker Swarm mode. With Docker Secrets the environment variables that contain credentials for other subsystems are mounted into the Telegraf Container as files. These secret files are read through the Docker Secret Store plugin and passed to the respective plugins in a relatively safe manner. By using the Docker Secret Store Plugin, one can also avoid credentials that were previously visible via environment variables, to be now hidden behind runtime secret files within the container. Standard Method with Environment Variables As an example, it is possible to pass the credentials to a plugin via the environment variable placeholder in a telegraf configuration file where the credentials for a plugin exist in a .env file (e.g. MQTT input Plugin)

also the docker-compose.yml file is very picky about what you have in it and where. Please read this so you know how to format it https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/spec.md

As part my quadlet helper tool, podlet, I'm adding functionality to convert compose files into k8s yaml to use with quadlet as an alternative to creating a bunch of separate quadlet files, which I've also added functionality for. So I would like to be able to transform the options on compose volumes into k8s yaml. For example, using the volume.podman.io/driver annotation to change the volume driver for a specific volume if possible.

If you find this helpful feature, please leave your feedback and suggestions here.

The compose spec will give what you need. https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/spec.md

Indeed, as per the compose-spec a lot of what was version specific is going away

Hello everyone, I just made a tool to visualize compose files, and all the parsing rules follow the [compose-spec](https://github.com/compose-spec/compose-spec/blob/master/spec.md). I hope this tool will help you :D

> We are uding docker-in-docker at the moment

You can also run a "less privileged" container with all the features of Docker by using rootless buildkit in Kubernetes. Here are some examples:

https://github.com/moby/buildkit/tree/master/examples/kubern...

https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/master/examples/kubern...

It's also possible to run dedicated buildkitd workers and connect to them remotely.

- BuildOp evaluates its input as additional LLB operations to add to the graph to allow for dynamic build graphs (also unused in the Dockerfile frontend)

With the Dockerfile Explorer, we run the Dockerfile frontend[1] that BuildKit uses inside of WASM to parse and produce the LLB output locally in your browser. We then embed the Monaco Editor so that you can change your Dockerfile to see how it impacts the LLB output that BuildKit will use to build your Docker image.

You can see a quick video and read more details on how it all works here: https://depot.dev/blog/dockerfile-explorer.

We'd love any feedback or ideas folks would like around this type of tool!

[0] https://github.com/moby/buildkit#exploring-llb

Now since Kubernetes works off of containerd I'll be taking a different approach on handling container builds by using nerdctl and the buildkit that comes bundled with it. I'll do this on the amd64 control plane node since it's beefier than my Raspberry Pi workers for handling builds and build related services. Go ahead and download and unpack the latest nerdctl release as of writing (make sure to check the release page in case there's a new one):

There's a 2-year-old moby/buildkit GitHub issue about frequent build cache misses when using the BuildKit docker-container driver and multi-stage builds. Anyone else in this sub run into this problem and/or have reasonable workarounds? It seems like something that should come up pretty often.

A couple months ago I encountered a bug in buildkit - when enabling OpenTelemetry tracing, we got occasional panics. With a bit of investigation, we found the cause, fixed and tested in our fork and internal deployments, and pushed to upstream.

I do some search in the internet and there seems to be no good solution, so I just create a feature request: https://github.com/moby/buildkit/issues/3859

Yeah, only Linux containers at the moment, BuildKit is the way we are constructing pipelines and doing caching. Split on if we will support non-linux hosts, but definitely want to find a good solution to not doing Docker-in-Docker.

Relevant issues are https://github.com/moby/buildkit/issues/3011 and https://github.com/moby/buildkit/issues/1512.