completions VS Next.js

I am building _exactly_ the same thing for Playwright over at https://ray.run/. I think this is the future of writing tests no doubt. Planning to launch next week.

Note: Use page.goto('/') and have "baseURL": "http://ray.run" set in the playwright.config.ts file for concise code.

Your website https://ray.run/ does have that nostalgic early 2000s vibe, which is cool! Regarding the search functionality, you might want to explore open-source alternatives to Algolia.

Projects like Elasticsearch, Solr, or even using Google Custom Search can provide search capabilities without the cost. They might require a bit more setup and maintenance, but they can be budget-friendly options for a free community.

In case you need help or assistance with your project, feel free to contact us! https://www.ratherlabs.com

* Most of the pages I use are rendered at the request time, rather than build time

For context, this is the website https://ray.run/

Ensuring in-article hover definitions for terms on the https://ray.run/ blog.

I have added a zone to Cloud DNS (GCP) for https://ray.run/

I updated completions library to allow statically typed responses:

import { type Browser, chromium, test as base } from '@playwright/test'; import getPort from 'get-port'; import { playAudit } from 'playwright-lighthouse'; export const test = base.extend<{}, { browser: Browser; port: number }>({ browser: [ async ({ port }, use) => { const browser = await chromium.launch({ args: [`--remote-debugging-port=${port}`], }); await use(browser); await browser.close(); }, { scope: 'worker' }, ], port: [ // eslint-disable-next-line no-empty-pattern async ({}, use) => { // Assign a unique port for each playwright worker to support parallel tests const port = await getPort(); await use(port); }, { scope: 'worker' }, ], }); test.describe('Accessibility Testing with Lighthouse', () => { test('should pass the Lighthouse accessibility audit', async ({ page, port, }) => { await page.goto('https://ray.run/'); await playAudit({ page, port, thresholds: { accessibility: 100, }, }); }); });

import { test } from '@playwright/test' test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => { await page.goto('https://ray.run/login') await page.fill('#username', 'admin') await page.fill('#password', 'password123') await page.click('#login-button') expect(await page.url()).toContain('/dashboard') }) test('should display user profile', async ({ page }) => { await page.click('#profile-button') expect(await page.textContent('body')).toContain('Admin User') }) // Other tests...

Next.js is a powerful React framework that enables developers to build server-rendered applications, static websites, and more. It's designed for production and provides features like automatic code splitting and optimized prefetching.

// source: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/src/lib/worker.ts#L121C15-L129C16 for (;;) { onActivity() const result = await Promise.race(\[ (this.\_worker as any)\[method\](...args), restartPromise, \]) if (result !== RESTARTED) return result if (onRestart) onRestart(method, args, ++attempts) }

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27666 One of them said 'renaming folder to uppercase' might cause trouble. git might not recognize case-sensetive changes by default.

Next.js has long cemented itself as one of the front runners in the web framework world for JavaScript/TypeScript projects so we’re going to be using that. More specifically we’re going to be using V14 of Next.js which allows us to use some exciting new features like Server Actions and the App Router.

Web frameworks like Next.js will usually include this feature, but do check that they set the caching headers correctly!

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

Next.js: For the website and the admin dashboard

Until the time of writing, there is no official example of how to enable runtime environmental variables in a Dockerized Next.js app, as utilizing unstable_noStore would only dynamically evaluate variables on the server (node.js runtime). There is also an interesting discussion regarding this topic on GitHub.

next.js is a very popular React framework. remix-adonisjs includes more functionality through the AdonisJS backend ecosystem, and should be easier to self-host and self-manage.