community-protocols
view_component
community-protocols | view_component | |
---|---|---|
8 | 74 | |
168 | 3,155 | |
0.0% | 0.9% | |
5.4 | 8.9 | |
about 1 month ago | 4 days ago | |
Ruby | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
community-protocols
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
> except that "reactivity" does not meet the bar of developers collectively having landed on a solution to a common problem
Now that everyone seems to be in love with signals, there is work going on in the web components community group to prepare a spec for a signal (or observable, not sure what they are trying to call it) primitive [0]. It seems that they are getting ready to bring it to TC39 as a proposal.
(In the meantime, the Observable primitive from rxjs been given a go-ahead for browser implementation. There is a proposal ready [1], and I think I heard that it may already be in Chrome behind a flag [2].
So yeah; it's gonna be fun. Especially if both groups call their primitive Observable :-)
0 - https://github.com/webcomponents-cg/community-protocols/issu...
1 - https://github.com/WICG/observable
2 - https://nitter.net/BenLesh/status/1737174784406933599
-
Show HN: Hyphen – custom element base class for good ergonomics
The custom element spec definitely only deals with the mechanics of when are where to run your component's lifecycle code - it says nothing about data. So your choices are basically property accessors, which are interoperable, but require prop-drilling for global-ish data, or something proprietary like a state management library.
The Web Components Community Group (WCCG) is offering something of a third way with the community protocols: https://github.com/webcomponents-cg/community-protocols
The Context protocol provides tree-scoped ambient data in an interoperable way. It's implemented by Lit and FAST (I believe). It doesn't replace a data store, but it's often used to provide data stores to components, and at least reduce some coupling.
-
Events are the shit
Did you know events can also carry promises? A great showcase of this pattern is the Pending Task Protocol by the Web Components Community Group. Now, "Pending Task Protocol" sounds very fancy, but really, it's just an event that carries a promise.
-
Nx Console gets Lit
If you’re coming from the Angular world, you probably appreciate the great dependency injection (DI) mechanism they have. You can centrally define some services and reuse them across your app, without thinking about passing on props from component to component - the DI system takes care of it. Lit provides something similar via the [@lit-labs/context](https://lit.dev/docs/data/context/) package. It’s based on the Context Community Protocol and similar to React’s context API.
-
Back to the Front-end: Exploring the Future of the Umbraco UI (Part 9 - Context API)
Fundamentally it is an event based mechanism to access state or "context" from ancestores of a component node. Based on the Web Components Context Protocol RFC which in turn is inspired by React's Context Api, the key purpose is to solve the problem of prop drilling.
- 🕎 8 Days of Web Components Tips
-
JavaScript vs JavaScript: Round 2. Fight!
The conversation led to the creation of https://github.com/webcomponents-cg/community-protocols. So there is some effort to standardize at least on convention for these higher-order considerations, but working through this and how opinionated it is made me recognize even more that this has a lot of similarities to a different group building a different framework. Tricky balance.
-
We Use Web Components at GitHub
I’m pretty actively following a lot of the web components community so I thought I would jump in here with some hopefully helpful information. Depending on what you mean by SEO it’s worth noting that for a while now Google and I believe Bing and a few others haven’t had any kind of requirement to pre-render content. You can just serve standard web components or any kind of SPA style front end and it will get indexed just fine, no penalties and no real issues unless you’re doing something particularly strange.
However, one of the more exciting projects in the web components space (lit.dev) now also supports proper SSR as well which is a very new thing in the world of web components. They are trying to build it in such a way that any other library can take advantage of through a common interface.
In fact there are some kind of early stage talks happening over here https://github.com/webcomponents/community-protocols where a bunch of companies like Google, Adobe, ING and others are trying to develop some open protocols on a whole bunch of topics to improve interoperability between various libraries so that no one has to buy in 100% to any one setup.
view_component
- Things I wish I knew before moving 50K lines of code to React Server Components
-
Supercharged table component built with ViewComponent
When searching for examples of table components built with the ViewComponent gem, I was surprised to find none. After some inquiries, I came across examples that worked like this:
-
More expressive APIs for View Components
View components offer two primary ways to interact with the component: passing arguments to the initializer and using slots:
- Have you been using ViewComponent. What advantages do you see in it?
-
How can I integrate VueJS into a rails 7 application? What is the workflow?
For example, splitting out views into partials? Or the new ViewComponent feature that's becoming quite popular - https://viewcomponent.org/
- Helpers vs Components
-
Vanilla Rails view components with partials | Stanko K.R.
I used to do "pure ruby" approach to that -- but basically wound up realizing I was re-inventing github's view_component. Their design goals were similar enough to what I was trying to do, that it made more sense just to use that, rather than try to re-invent it myself.
-
Gnarly Learnings from March 2023
ViewComponent
- Os benefícios de componentizar as views do Rails
-
Does anyone kind of miss simpler webpages?
The linked one is my Rails implementation, written for ViewComponent. The official version uses Nunjucks.
What are some alternatives?
web3-sign-msg - web3-sign-msg is a modern web component built with ficusjs to sign messages with your eth private key in Metamask
Stimulus - A modest JavaScript framework for the HTML you already have
vscode-webview-ui-toolkit - A component library for building webview-based extensions in Visual Studio Code.
turbo-rails - Use Turbo in your Ruby on Rails app
soci-frontend - [Moved to: https://github.com/jjcm/nonio-frontend]
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
React - The library for web and native user interfaces.
cypress-rails - Helps you write Cypress tests of your Rails app
services-as-dom-elements
hotwire-rails - Use Hotwire in your Ruby on Rails app
nx-console - Nx Console is the user interface for Nx & Lerna.
i18n-tasks - Manage translation and localization with static analysis, for Ruby i18n