com.microsoft.Edge | com.skype.Client | |
---|---|---|
15 | 8 | |
50 | 14 | |
- | - | |
8.3 | 6.8 | |
7 days ago | 10 days ago | |
Shell | ||
- | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
com.microsoft.Edge
Posts with mentions or reviews of com.microsoft.Edge.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-16.
- Sneaky MF
- How Install & Use Microsoft Edge, OneDrive, Skype, Office 365 & Teams on Linux
-
What's up with the Flatpak version of Edge?
edge from flathub-beta works ok here is exactly deb convert to flatpak https://github.com/flathub/com.microsoft.Edge/blob/beta/com.microsoft.Edge.yaml
- DRM videos not working in Edge.
-
Performance and quality improvements on Linux and ChromeOS!
The link is here: https://github.com/flathub/com.microsoft.Edge/issues/214
-
What advantage does a Flatpak have over a distro package?
"I'm running FooLinux, I refuse to run Flatpak, and I want to use Fuse, and Citra, and MS Edge, and Minecraft Modpack Manager, and BoilR, and Yuzu! And they must all stay up-to-date! And I will not use Flatpak! They must be packaged specifically for FooLinux!"
-
I'm looking for a PDF program / Fedora 36 Gnome
Disclaimer - Not sure if Edge will work exactly the same as on Windows as I don't use it. But there is a Flatpak version of it as well https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.microsoft.Edge
-
Name a more useless feature in Windows 10... I'll wait.
TYL that Microsoft ports some of their stuff to Linux just because they can.
-
Hardcore gaming on Pop!_OS 22.04 with WhiteSur-gtk theme and Papirus icons
Also in Flatpak which is handy for a Steam Deck: https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.microsoft.Edge
- A Letter to Microsoft for Not Attributing Authors of the Edge Flatpak App
com.skype.Client
Posts with mentions or reviews of com.skype.Client.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-08.
-
Red Hat considers Xorg “deprecated” and will remove it in the next RHEL
Screen sharing seems to be a difficult problem to resolve. Zoom only just resolved this recently[1], Webex has been promising a fix for a while[2], and Skype still hasn't done anything[3].
[1] https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/6634039380877-Zoom...
[2] https://help.webex.com/en-us/article/9vstcdb/Webex-App-for-L...
[3] https://github.com/flathub/com.skype.Client/issues/142
- How Install & Use Microsoft Edge, OneDrive, Skype, Office 365 & Teams on Linux
- Installed Void on My New Work Laptop But Running Into some Issues
-
No camera or mic on Skype in both 15.3 and TW
If the device still works in the os and just not in skype. I would try the flatpak package. https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.skype.Client
-
Solus no longer runs Skype or Wickr, please help
https://snapcraft.io/skype or Flatpak https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.skype.Client
-
Can't start Skype flatpak on Fedora 33
I also found some old issue on Github Latest version of Skype won't run #70
-
Important info for Skype users on Fedora
Alternatively one can use the Flatpak packaged Skype.
-
Can we have an objective, non-FUD, user-centric comparison/discussion of Snap and Flatpak for 2021?
I have no idea if that is true or not, I haven't used Skype for more than a decade. But, an app running as a Flatpak can't directly create files in /etc/ even if that directory was exposed in the sandbox (which it isn't in the Skype flatpak, as you can see here), just like any other process running as a non-root user can't create files in /etc/ (unless your permissions on /etc/ are severely messed up). So if what you claim is true, it has nothing to do with Flatpak's sandbox or with portals. And since in the default configuration the pulseaudio daemon (which is running outside the sandbox) does not run as root either, I severly doubt that what you claim here is true at all.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing com.microsoft.Edge and com.skype.Client you can also consider the following projects:
com.google.Chrome
pkg2appimage - Tool and recipes to convert existing deb packages to AppImage
firejail - Linux namespaces and seccomp-bpf sandbox
flathub - Issue tracker and new submissions
xdg-desktop-portal - Desktop integration portal
com.microsoft.Teams
Firefox-UI-Fix - 🦊 I respect proton UI and aim to improve it.
fakeprovide - A tool for generating "fake" rpm packages to resolve otherwise intractable dependency issues.
ostree - Operating system and container binary deployment and upgrades
com.microsoft.Edge vs com.google.Chrome
com.skype.Client vs pkg2appimage
com.microsoft.Edge vs firejail
com.skype.Client vs flathub
com.microsoft.Edge vs xdg-desktop-portal
com.skype.Client vs com.microsoft.Teams
com.microsoft.Edge vs Firefox-UI-Fix
com.skype.Client vs fakeprovide
com.microsoft.Edge vs com.microsoft.Teams
com.skype.Client vs ostree