codestream
xUnit
Our great sponsors
codestream | xUnit | |
---|---|---|
4 | 36 | |
926 | 4,020 | |
0.8% | 1.6% | |
9.9 | 9.2 | |
3 days ago | 6 days ago | |
TypeScript | C# | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
codestream
-
Generating Code Coverage Metrics for .NET Framework Applications
After struggling with this on the Visual Studio side of CodeStream recently, I finally managed to get it working. At a high level, let me outline what I had to do –
-
15+ Best Productivity Tools For Programmers in 2021,🛠Boost Up Your Productivity🚀
CodeStream is a free open-source extension for VS Code, Visual Studio, and JetBrains. It supercharges development workflows by putting collaboration tools in your IDE. It supports pull requests from GitHub, BitBucket and GitLab, issue management from Jira, Trello, Asana and 9 others, and provides code discussion that ties it all together, integrated with Slack, MS Teams, email, and in-editor notifications.
-
Full-featured GitLab extension for VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains now available
I added a new issue for this at https://github.com/TeamCodeStream/codestream/issues/503
-
How we extended GitLens’ Pull Request functionality in Visual Studio Code
Our complete solution can be found in the CodeStream repo on GitHub or alternatively on CodeStream itself.
xUnit
-
Optimizing C# code analysis for quicker .NET compilation
Several well-known NuGet packages such as xUnit.net, FluentAssertions, StyleCop, Entity Framework Core, and others include by default a significant number of Roslyn analyzers. They help you adhere to the conventions and best practices of these libraries.
-
Integration testing in Umbraco 10+: Validating document types
Most of my rules apply to document types, so let's build some tests for document types. We start by creating a new test class and a new test function and getting a list of all document types. This test is created using xUnit and FluentAssertions:
-
Comprehensive Unit Testing: A Line-by-Line Approach
xUnit -> https://xunit.net/
-
CI/CD Pipeline Using GitHub Actions: Automate Software Delivery
.NET / xUnit / NUnit / MSTest
-
Fluent Assertions: Fluently Assert the Result of .NET Tests
This library extends the traditional assertions provided by frameworks like MSTest, NUnit, or XUnit by offering a more extensive set of extension methods. Fluent Assertions supports a wide range of types like collections, strings, and objects and even allows for more advanced assertions like throwing exceptions.
-
FluentValidation in .NET
You can verify the functionality of this validator by writing the following tests (using xUnit):
-
Running a XUnit test with C#?
The git repo has other runners. AssemblyRunner appears to be the best fit for an already compiled tests project, but there is a runner that can be wrapped into an MSBuild task for example.
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
At this point you're going to see a familiar screen asking you to select a project. Here we're looking for a test project. By default, Visual Studio gives you access to 3 different testing frameworks based on your choice of project. These are MSTest, XUnit and NUnit. Ultimately, all 3 of these testing accomplish the same thing, and I've worked with all of them at various points in my career. The difference is mainly in exact syntax and documentation. Although, it's generally considered that MSTest is a little "older" than NUnit or XUnit, so I tend to see it less now. For the purposes of this demo, I'm going to go with NUnit:
-
Integration tests for AWS serverless solution
xUnit unit tests tool
-
Test-Driven Development
Use a testing framework: Utilize a testing framework like NUnit, xUnit, or MSTest to create, organize, and run your tests. These frameworks provide a consistent way to write tests, generate test reports, and integrate with continuous integration tools.
What are some alternatives?
vscode-pull-request-github - GitHub Pull Requests for Visual Studio Code
Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
intellij-plugins - Open-source plugins included in the distribution of IntelliJ IDEA Ultimate and other IDEs based on the IntelliJ Platform
NUnit - NUnit Framework
create-pull-request - A GitHub action to create a pull request for changes to your repository in the actions workspace
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
Sentry - Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
generic-webhook-trigger-plugin - Can receive any HTTP request, extract any values from JSON or XML and trigger a job with those values available as variables. Works with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira and many more.
NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
octosync - An open-source solution to keep Github and Jira issues in sync. An alternative to Exalate and Unito.
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter