code-review VS youtube-sub-extractor.el

Besides all that, I'm also having to take care of my work duties. When I started my day earlier, as per usual, I opened gh-notify buffer to check all GitHub notifications. Issues, Pull-requests. Using code-review I quickly checked a few PRs, scrolled through the diffs, posted a couple of comments, and approved the PRs.

If I want to review a PR, there's code-review.

Hit Ctrl-p from comment up into diff in code-review, hit RET to go directly to real file in correct place (feature not yet implemented)

The second problem is reviewing PRs. The best Emacs package for that today is code-review.el. I briefly talked about it a while ago https://twitter.com/iLemming/status/1463317344437121025

Happy to say that my initial goal to support Github, Gitlab & Bitbucket is finally coming together. This PR https://github.com/wandersoncferreira/code-review/pull/156 includes basic bitbucket review workflow to the package.

As long as there are only two contributors (of which only one has signfiicant contributions), why not add it to ELPA? If the author reads this and is interested, send an email to emacs-devel.

I'm trying to use wandersoncferreira/code-review to do GitHub code reviews from Emacs. As a review author, I'd like to reply to comments reviewers have made. If I on such a comment in the *Code Review* buffer, I get a new buffer where I can write my own comment. I do C-c C-c when I'm done. My comments then shows up in the *Code Review* buffer. But how do I submit my comments to GitHub. I have tried a number of M-x calls but non of them is working for me. How do I submit my comment replies? I really like the package by the way, It's great to be able to do code reviews from inside Emacs.

I am also finding many great videos on YouTube. I found that I learn the material better if I read through the transcripts. I usually pull the subtitles and use them to make more notes.

I like eww because it allows me to focus on the text. I love text; text is awesome, it lets me slash through the forest of information without having my mind wander around, overstimulating my brain neurons with fonts, colors, background images, icons, side banners, ads, etc. If you've never read Graydon's "Always bet on text" post, definitely give it a gander. I agree with it almost entirely. Lately, I even stopped watching YouTube videos to learn anything, at least, not without speeding them up to 1.5x. But first, I would extract subtitles and quickly read through them, and then proceed to the watching. That lets me learn things and retain information much better. Yes, text is not perfect and interactive, visual data has incredible value and very often text just cannot replace it. But my initial instinct is to scout the text first, and then, if needed get to rest.