code-review VS orgajs

Besides all that, I'm also having to take care of my work duties. When I started my day earlier, as per usual, I opened gh-notify buffer to check all GitHub notifications. Issues, Pull-requests. Using code-review I quickly checked a few PRs, scrolled through the diffs, posted a couple of comments, and approved the PRs.

If I want to review a PR, there's code-review.

Hit Ctrl-p from comment up into diff in code-review, hit RET to go directly to real file in correct place (feature not yet implemented)

The second problem is reviewing PRs. The best Emacs package for that today is code-review.el. I briefly talked about it a while ago https://twitter.com/iLemming/status/1463317344437121025

Happy to say that my initial goal to support Github, Gitlab & Bitbucket is finally coming together. This PR https://github.com/wandersoncferreira/code-review/pull/156 includes basic bitbucket review workflow to the package.

As long as there are only two contributors (of which only one has signfiicant contributions), why not add it to ELPA? If the author reads this and is interested, send an email to emacs-devel.

I'm trying to use wandersoncferreira/code-review to do GitHub code reviews from Emacs. As a review author, I'd like to reply to comments reviewers have made. If I on such a comment in the *Code Review* buffer, I get a new buffer where I can write my own comment. I do C-c C-c when I'm done. My comments then shows up in the *Code Review* buffer. But how do I submit my comments to GitHub. I have tried a number of M-x calls but non of them is working for me. How do I submit my comment replies? I really like the package by the way, It's great to be able to do code reviews from inside Emacs.

Depending on how you log data and take notes you might find the orgparse Python library or the orga JS library useful.

That is perfect, all org-syntax features we need are done properly. I can manage to use the orgapp code in some simple tool.

org syntax isn't as confined to the emacs world as it used to be. Check out, e.g., https://github.com/orgapp/orgajs, which parses org files into an 'abstract syntax tree', which can then be transformed/picked for info/indexed, etc. etc. by any number of tools. Pandoc's support is also improving as far as I'm aware.

I am an avid emacs user! Lately, I found a tool named orgajs (https://github.com/orgapp/orgajs/). This seemed great for my needs but it is behind on maintenance.

Thanks @preek. I mentioned you guys in [3] above. BTW I'm actually using this parser: https://github.com/orgapp/orgajs for my product (https://braintool.org), so there are other choices. I guess the key thing is a single well defined grammar.

Is GDrive syncing working in Organice these days? I've wanted to demonstrate interop with BrainTool (which syncs to GDrive files) but last I checked there was some bug.

Overall Orga's great and I really don't mean to diminish the author's work in any way, but I have had a couple issues. A number of them have been fixed, which is great, but I got stuck on this one about line breaks when using auto-fill mode. I think it's fixed in a newer version of Orga, but upgrading broke my build and I've spent enough hours trying to fix it that I'm looking for options.

MDX is non-trivial. But if all you need is gatsby with org, a simpler plugin similar to gatsby-transformer-remark is doable. gatsby-transformer-orga would be a good inspiration here.