cockpit-podman
jc
cockpit-podman | jc | |
---|---|---|
4 | 96 | |
390 | 7,573 | |
1.8% | - | |
9.5 | 9.5 | |
7 days ago | 5 days ago | |
JavaScript | Python | |
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cockpit-podman
-
Monitoring and visibility of rootless containers running by different users on single server
Hey, I have homelab NUC server where I run different services as rootless podman pods and containers running by dedicated users, eg. nextcloud pod running by nextcloud user, gitea by gitea, znc by znc and more. Next step was trying to monitor these services. First trey was using cockpit-podman feature, but in UI I see only containers of my user and rootfull which both was empty. I cannot switch to another user because the're not capable for login to cockpit. Now I'm testing prometheus and podman-exporter which seems ok, but again I see containers only if I run prometheus-podman-exporter service as user who run another podman container (e.g. as nextcloud user). Of course I can run this service parallel as dedicated user with another port and add them as target to prometheus scrape config but from obvious reason I want to avoid that. Is it more gentle way to monitor my pods? I know that those namespaces are one of the main feature of Podman but I don't consider this before my deploys :)
- Cockpit Project
-
Front end ...gui for podman.
Cockpit has a podman module (cockpit-podman)
-
Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods
Tested podman to replace docker (the cli) on a mac yesterday Most of it works fine. They have an easy way to setup a vm now with `podman machine`: https://podman.io/getting-started/installation#macos
If you want the management GUI, install cockpit: https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit-podman
Try podman, you'll be impressed.
jc
-
Xonsh: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell
https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc - "CLI tool and python library that converts the output of popular command-line tools, file-types, and common strings to JSON, YAML, or Dictionaries. This allows piping of output to tools like jq and simplifying automation scripts."
-
Gooey: Turn almost any Python command line program into a full GUI application
> I'd love to see programs communicate through a typed JSON/proto format that shed enough details to make this more independent, and get useful shell command structuring/completion or full blown GUIs from simply introspecting the expected input and output types.
You should try PowerShell. It's basically Microsoft's .NET ecosystem molded into an interactive command line. I'm not entirely sure if PoweShell can make full use of the static types that build up its core, but its ability to exchange objects in the command line is almost unmatched.
On Linux you can use `jc` (https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc) combined with `jq` (https://jqlang.github.io/jq/) to glue together command lines.
- jc: Converts the output of popular command-line tools to JSON
- why does the proc directory exist?
- Open source python projecto to contribute to
-
jq 1.7 Released
In addition to my previous comment about jq-like tools, I want to share a couple other interesting tools, which I use alongside jq are jo [0] and jc [1].
[0]: https://github.com/jpmens/jo
[1]: https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc
-
The Case for Nushell
> I wanted to write some wrappers for the standard commands that automatically did all this via `jq`.
If you're not already aware of it, you may wish to check out `jc`[0] which describes itself as a "CLI tool and python library that converts the output of popular command-line tools, file-types, and common strings to JSON, YAML, or Dictionaries. This allows piping of output to tools like jq..."
The `jc` documentation[1] & parser[2] for `ls` also demonstrates that reliable & cross-platform parsing of even "basic" commands can be non-trivial.
[0] https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc
[1] https://kellyjonbrazil.github.io/jc/docs/parsers/ls
[2] https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jc/blob/4cd721be8595db52b6...
What are some alternatives?
traefik - The Cloud Native Application Proxy
jq - Command-line JSON processor [Moved to: https://github.com/jqlang/jq]
podman-compose - a script to run docker-compose.yml using podman
jq - Command-line JSON processor
machine
murex - A smarter shell and scripting environment with advanced features designed for usability, safety and productivity (eg smarter DevOps tooling)
opentelemetry-collector-contrib - Contrib repository for the OpenTelemetry Collector
jello - CLI tool to filter JSON and JSON Lines data with Python syntax. (Similar to jq)
toolbox - Tool for interactive command line environments on Linux
babashka - A Clojure babushka for the grey areas of Bash (native fast-starting Clojure scripting environment) [Moved to: https://github.com/babashka/babashka]
singularity - Singularity has been renamed to Apptainer as part of us moving the project to the Linux Foundation. This repo has been persisted as a snapshot right before the changes.
Octo Pack - Creates Octopus-compatible NuGet packages