cloudgamestream VS docker-android

I haven't, but looking at https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream it seems it's possible to set up.

Very simple. I used azure and aws. Did not use gcp but same as well. I watched this channel. https://youtube.com/c/TechGuruDirect And used this script as well https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream Watch videos carefully. Especially moonlight for aws is great. For azure i used different way and worked.

Yeah that's the problem. There is no shield tab and from the screenshot it's clear that it says it is "Not ready". I understand that's why I need to run the previous script from:https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream

No you dont need Windows 10 Pro. I have Moonlight working on my AWS instance. https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream - Just use this script and when asked if you want to install drivers choose no and choose yes for vbcable. It will install Geforce Experience and patch it to work with Tesla GPU and Windows Server. After that you can enable shield. Also open the ports required for moonlight in security group in aws console.

https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream - This is the link to the script. I just used it yesterday and it works. When the script prompts say 'yes' for vbcable and 'no' for drivers. Ask me if you have any doubts.

I used power shell script from https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream

You can use this to enable gamestream on Tesla GPU's and use Parsec or Moonlight.

Or, they could focus on improving the wireless wifi/5g capabilities, so you can have a better desktop experience via a cloud computer, which will give you a better desktop experience then anything you run locally on a smartphone. Which you can easily do now, and it can run games better then any mobile phone. https://github.com/acceleration3/cloudgamestream

If it was me I'd go with a docker-android container. You could go with Anbox or a virtual android machine, but if you just need to run one app, I think a docker container would be the way to go, since you could script it to open, run your app, and shut down.

I haven't personally tested this one, however, there is this project on github: https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android which uses containers.

I know this isn't the focus of the article, but this license provision in a linked project is outright strange.

>By using this software you agree that the following non-PII (non personally identifiable information) data will be collected, processed and used by the maintainers for the purpose of improving the docker-android project. Anonymisation with respect of the IP address means that only the first two octets of the IP address are collected.

https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android/blob/master/LICENSE...

How can you call a project Apache when you're forcing people to pay via their data ? Why is their no opt out option?

Absent that this seems like a great QA automation tool. Or a Tinder bot farm...

Alternatively, there are a few docker projects such as this one https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android that might work well. Haven’t tried it.

So far i was using docker-android i did use in my ubuntu during yesterday and was working fine

https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android this perhaps?

It's got absolutely nothing to do with the trustability of Android emulators. In fact I highly doubt they used something like Bluestacks, but rather something that can be chained with scripts like an Android docker container.