clippy-check
identicon-rs
clippy-check | identicon-rs | |
---|---|---|
6 | 3 | |
284 | 16 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 5.4 | |
over 1 year ago | 2 days ago | |
TypeScript | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
clippy-check
-
Github Actions for Rust is automatically creating jobs
And this gives us a place to look for a related issue: actions-rs/clippy-check#45 is a match: "result annotation sometimes gets added to the wrong workflow".
-
GitHub Actions for Clippy
https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check ? But it looks like that this isn't actively maintained.
-
Married man seeking Clippy linting github action
I used to use https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check, but it's been unmaintained for several years and is out-of-date.
-
How to make your GitHub repository look and feel professional ✈🌍
Browse workflows and configure those which meet your needs. I use the Rust and clippy-check actions on all of my important Rust repositories.
-
GitHub Workflow: Should clippy and rustfmt run in a separate workflow?
is https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check the preferred way to run clippy in the workflow?
-
Rust CI with GitHub Actions
The Clippy job runs clippy through actions-rs/clippy-check@v1. You can add a clippy.toml or .clippy.toml to configure the style.
identicon-rs
-
Github Actions for Rust is automatically creating jobs
I believe this is just a glitch from another job triggered from a different workflow on the same merge commit. The clippy summary here shows as completing in 0s, does not show as CI usage on the job (https://github.com/conways-glider/identicon-rs/actions/runs/3772908305/usage) and in fact shows as completing before the job. The "build" job started at 12:56pm PST, the "clippy" job at 12:55pm. All of these point to this being an artificially created "check run" added to the workflow via API with inaccurate information.
Your branch actions from PR #30 has those steps so it makes perfect sense that they are run.
What are some alternatives?
cargo - 📦 GitHub Action for Rust `cargo` command
nutype - Rust newtype with guarantees 🇺🇦 🦀
cargo-install - GitHub action for cached Rust crates installation.
rust-library-i18n - Rust 核心库和标准库中文翻译,可作为 IDE 工具的智能提示,并生成本地 API 文档
publish-unit-test-result-action - GitHub Action to publish unit test results on GitHub
tangram - Tangram makes it easy for programmers to train, deploy, and monitor machine learning models.
rust-ci-github-actions-workflow - Rust project template with CI workflow in GitHub Actions
hello-world.rs - 🚀Memory safe, blazing fast, configurable, minimal hello world written in rust(🚀) in a few lines of code with few(1092🚀) dependencies🚀
upload-artifact
stretto - Stretto is a Rust implementation for Dgraph's ristretto (https://github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto). A high performance memory-bound Rust cache.
toolchain - 🛠️ GitHub Action for `rustup` commands
poem - A full-featured and easy-to-use web framework with the Rust programming language.