climate-change-assignment VS license

still fails, but with this: 08:27:48.330 Cloning repository... 08:27:49.214 From https://github.com/mdwalters/climate-change-assignment 08:27:49.215 * branch 776eb8f740add8367ba2c3108724a435da8af594 -> FETCH_HEAD 08:27:49.215 08:27:49.255 HEAD is now at 776eb8f Create .nvmrc 08:27:49.256 08:27:49.396 08:27:49.422 Success: Finished cloning repository files 08:27:50.108 Installing dependencies 08:27:50.119 Python version set to 2.7 08:27:51.983 Attempting node version '18' from .nvmrc 08:27:53.382 Downloading and installing node v18.13.0... 08:27:53.800 Downloading https://nodejs.org/dist/v18.13.0/node-v18.13.0-linux-x64.tar.xz... 08:27:54.228 Computing checksum with sha256sum 08:27:54.367 Checksums matched! 08:27:58.457 node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.27' not found (required by node) 08:27:58.458 node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by node) 08:27:58.458 node: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.28' not found (required by node) 08:27:58.506 nvm is not compatible with the npm config "prefix" option: currently set to "" 08:27:58.508 Run `npm config delete prefix` or `nvm use --delete-prefix v18.13.0` to unset it. 08:27:58.509 Failed to install node version '18' 08:27:58.513 Failed: build command exited with code: 1 08:27:59.407 Failed: an internal error occurred

I'm working on a clause for my business that would restrict the use of my software by entities that directly or indirectly support or promote fossil fuel usage, and I would love to get some input from HN community on how to draft it effectively.

Here's the draft clause:

“The use of the software is strictly prohibited by any company or entity whose primary or significant activity contributes directly or indirectly to the exploration, production, expansion, or support of fossil fuel resources —explicitly including oil, natural gas, and coal— and related infrastructure.”

A second part could be added to explicit the prohibited activities:

“This includes, but is not limited to, companies engaged in oil and gas exploration, logistical support for fossil fuel extraction, management and operational services for existing fossil fuel production facilities, and initiatives aimed at increasing the output of fossil fuel resources. The prohibition extends to the marketing, promotion, or advertising of such activities, provision of services, technical support, or resources to directly involved entities in the fossil fuel sector, financial organizations funding or investing in related projects or infrastructures. Further, it encompasses entities that consume substantial quantities of fossil fuels and do not exhibit a verifiable commitment to significantly reduce such consumption within an established timeframe.”

The inspiration partly comes from the Climate Strike Software License[1], but I'm aiming for something more encompassing.

I've written more about this on my blog[2], but here, I'm specifically looking for your expertise on the legal and practical aspects of such a clause.

What are your thoughts? How could this be improved?

[1] https://climatestrike.software/

[2] https://jereze.com/blog/no-fossil-fuel-clause/