cish VS hermes

The other day I was implementing an AST in Cish, when I realized I could leverage Cish's type-system to do the type checking for the AST automatically.

The latest release

Link to Github Release Page

Nice, although TeleClassic is a little different - it’s written ground up from just the stuff in .NETs stl, and I’m hoping this’ll provide the increased flexibility I want. Eventually I hope to use SuperForth, a language I wrote, as an in game scripting language which users can use to upload their own mini games.

Here’s the GitHub repo, and I recommend that you build with makefile.

machine.h

``` All of the above functions, with the exception of main, can be found in compiler.c.

I’m still working on SuperForth, a statically typed functional programming language. I’m currently working on reducing the memory footprint of the ast. Part of the reason it’s there is because the ast was designed before the virtual machine and compiler were implemented, so it’s kinda bloated at the moment

It’s pretty much high level c, but with anon functions and higher order functions. The original goal of the project was to provide higher level functional abstractions/a faster more portable runtime for running USACO solutions. Although it’s not nearly as fast as C, or even Java, it’s register based vm runs 3x as fast as python, with the same amount of portability. The compiler doesn’t apply many optimizations (it’s under 400 LOC), and the rest of the code is fairly short and simple to understand. check it out here

I’d really like to give you the benefit of the doubt here, but did you just copy the code from https://github.com/sebbekarlsson/hermes, change a few things (like the readme), rename the language, and say it’s your own? The file structure is exactly the same, and the code appears to be only modified (e.g. in main.c).

Well, it's kind of telling of your point, because I effectively can only look at one of those languages effectively, Erlang. I can't even look up Hermes with out literally getting articles written in Spanish about Egyptian hieroglyphics, and I had to narrow my search way down and look several pages before I even found a single youtube video that referenced what the code looked like, and none of it demonstrated anything "special" like what you're talking about, in fact, there's no way this could be what your talking about, it appears to have been written in the last couple of years. Unfortunately as it stands, none of the rest of your paragraph can be taken into consideration, because we have no example of what this supposed language actually looked like how to run it, only Wikipedia articles talking about it.