chibicc
IntercalScript
Our great sponsors
chibicc | IntercalScript | |
---|---|---|
21 | 10 | |
8,514 | 130 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
6 months ago | over 3 years ago | |
C | Brainfuck | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
chibicc
- Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
- Apple hiring compiler developers for improving Swift / C++ interoperability
-
GCC always assumes aligned pointer accesses
If a --k&r mode was to be reliable, wouldn't it need to get specified first? Otherwise people would start relying on some edge case.
If speed is not a requirement for the --k&r mode, you could just take the tis-interpreter and note that if it runs without UB, it is still much faster than an actual computer was when k&r were active.
Would it even be possible to specify a variant of C that contains no UB (e.g. would define exactly what happens on unaligned access), but can compile practical existing C89 programs? I wonder if it could be written such that it could actually specify the behaviour consistently across the language intersection supported by both of e.g. GCC 2.95 and Chibicc[0].
Or maybe there are so many bugs in GCC 2.95 that it would simply be infeasible? How much time would it take to specify?
[0]: https://github.com/rui314/chibicc
-
EU to vote regulation that has a considerable potential to hurt OSS
I was on the Eclipse Foundation call a few days ago regarding this topic and they said there was a well-established 3-part test for this in the EU courts. But I don't think I managed to take a screenshot, sorry.
Here is a snippet from the EU Blue Guide linked the from the Eclipse blog post:
"Commercial activity is understood as providing goods in a business related context. Non-profit organisations may be considered as carrying out commercial activities if they operate in such a context. This can only be appreciated on a case by case basis taking into account the regularity of the supplies, the characteristics of the product, the intentions of the supplier, etc. In principle, occasional supplies by charities or hobbyists should not be considered as taking place in a business related context."
I would consider GCC or React to fit this definition, while a hobby project like https://github.com/rui314/chibicc not to fit it.
-
Best practice to store context for a C compiler
chibicc
-
SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes
chibicc: https://github.com/rui314/chibicc (A reasonably digestible C implementation)
- List of (open source) C compilers
- Chibicc – A Small C Compiler
-
Are Hoistings Possible for C++?
When you say a fork of LLVM, am I correct in assuming that you specifically mean a fork of Clang? I don't see how the compiler backend would affect support for language extensions, regardless of whether it's an exception to that such as Tcc, Cproc, the MIR C jitter, lacc, 8cc, 9cc, and chibicc. Most of those are not for production, excluding Cproc and Tcc (at least according to Suckless or Oasis).
IntercalScript
- The IntercalScript Programming Language
-
Funny programming languages
I'm disappointed that my own IntercalScript didn't make the list.
-
Does the number of keywords really matter?
If someone thinks that having only 14 reserved keywords is important, you should show them IntercalScript.
- Swift Regrets: Wrap-up
-
Functional Programming Languages Sentiment Ranking
Intercalscript. I'm only partially joking. It actually has some pretty amazing features and it compiles to JS.
-
What are some simple but powerful compile-to-JS languages I might not know about, or that you are working on (not Elm, Reason, PureScript, or ClojureScript)?
IntercalScript
-
Seeing all these generics groupies huddling in this thread is quite hilarious to me. It takes me about 3 hours to write a generator that can spit out 3000 lines of code implementing 60 api calls.
Oh my God, and I thought this question from the IntercalScript FAQ was an original joke.
-
INTERCAL, YAML, And Other Horrible Programming Languages
INTERCAL got a modern overhaul: https://github.com/Storyyeller/IntercalScript
-
Of Semicolons And Statements
Sounds like some languages need to implement Automatic Semicolon Deletion.
-
Bootstrapping Case Studies
The IntercalScript compiler was originally written in Javascript, then rewritten in IntercalScript.
What are some alternatives?
8cc - A Small C Compiler
cubiml-demo - A simple ML-like programming language with subtyping and full type inference.
mold - Mold: A Modern Linker 🦠
karax - Karax. Single page applications for Nim.
build-your-own-x - Master programming by recreating your favorite technologies from scratch.
firefly-boot - Bootstrap compiler for Firefly
SmallerC - Simple C compiler
python-compiler - A Python bytecode compiler written in Python. This repository is now a fork of https://github.com/facebookincubator/python-compiler, upstream is there.
Co-dfns - High-performance, Reliable, and Parallel APL
toml - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language
quickjs - Public repository of the QuickJS Javascript Engine.
Pulumi - Pulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language. Build infrastructure intuitively on any cloud using familiar languages 🚀