caveman VS github-orgmode-tests

We are going to walk through the examples by building an online Warehouse management system using Caveman

Djula is a port of Python's Django template engine to Common Lisp. It's the default templating engine used by the framework Caveman for building web applications

Appreciate it. Can I ask one last thing. Between Snooze and Caveman2, which is the more current project?

This is interesting from a "look what we can do!" perspective, but practically speaking, I'm not sure there's a good reason for doing it this way. For all practical purposes, it would be better to use one of the "native" Common Lisp libraries for doing this, such as Caveman: http://8arrow.org/caveman/

Even as a big Common Lisp fan, I would really question using it in a situation where the project has strict requirements to use a particular framework for another language.

In this post, I am going to walk you through to setup Tailwind CSS for a Common Lisp web application using Caveman. If you want to know more about creating web applications using Common Lisp and Caveman, please check my previous posts on the topic.

We are going to use Caveman for scaffolding this project. Caveman is a lightweight web application framework created by Eitaro Fukamachi for Common lisp. Caveman is available on Quicklisp, so you can install it with:

Hence I chose Caveman for this project. After having been played around with and without Caveman for building web applications in Common Lisp, I found that it is the best framework out there for developing web apps in Lisp. Caveman is a lightweight web application framework created by Eitaro Fukamachi for Common lisp. Fukamachi has got some serious tools for doing web development in Lisp. Please feel free to check out his Github profile for more useful tools.

I have been trying to come up with a standard template using Caveman to deploy on Heroku. But I am struck with these issues, not quite getting it to work with the available buildpacks. Lot of the related articles are hopelessly outdated. Appreciate any help or pointers? https://github.com/fukamachi/caveman/issues/126 https://gitlab.com/duncan-bayne/heroku-buildpack-common-lisp/-/issues/6

- or to visualize and use it as a personal partner.

There's already a ton of open-source UIs such as Chatbot-ui[3] and Reor[4]. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Personally, I haven't been consistent enough through the years in note-taking.

So, I'm really curious to learn more about those of you who were and implemented such pipelines.

I'm sure there's a ton of really fascinating experiences.

[1] https://orgmode.org/

literate config (using ORG mode)

Obligatory reference to Emacs Org-Mode [1].

Author's approach is basically Org-Mode with fewer helpers.

Org-mode's power is that, at core, it's just a text file, with gradual augmentation.

Then again, Org-Mode is a tool you must install, accessible through a limited list of clients (Emacs obviously, but also VSCode), and the power of OP's approach is that it requires no external tools.

[1] https://orgmode.org

This reminds me a lot of [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.

If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."

Wow, no one has recommended Org mode (https://orgmode.org). I started using Emacs nearly 20 years ago specifically because of Org. I use Org for all my static sites, note taking, to-do lists and calendar. Org has a lightweight markup language that has far more features than Markdown (e.g., plain text spreadsheets!), but the markup isn't visible to the extent that Markdown is in most editors. Emacs with Org files behaves almost like a WYSIWYG editor. For example, links in Org files are clickable and their URLs aren't visible unless a cursor is hovered over them. I'm an obsessive note-taker with more than 6,000 Org files in my personal knowledge base and none of the dozens of other note-taking apps that I've evaluated comes even close to Emacs with Org. But to be fair, I create content on Linux only so support for mobile devices doesn't matter to me.

By the way, I think it's hilarious that you mentioned Dreamweaver, dv35z, because I experimented with using Dreamweaver for note-taking in the 90s! I still have a few HTML files that include notes I took back then using Dreamweaver. Needless to say, I definitely prefer Emacs with Org!

Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].

Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it's maturity, e.g. "evergreen state").

1. https://orgmode.org/