categorifier
Interpret Haskell programs into any cartesian closed category. (by con-kitty)
concat
Compiling to Categories (by compiling-to-categories)
categorifier | concat | |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 | |
56 | 430 | |
- | 0.2% | |
7.4 | 7.3 | |
3 months ago | 2 months ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
categorifier
Posts with mentions or reviews of categorifier.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-20.
-
Code generation with Haskell itself as the DSL
One step further is then (Compiling to Categories)[https://github.com/compiling-to-categories/concat] which tries to make the previous approach more convenient. It aims to overload any Haskell function from a -> b into a Category a b. Then, typeclass instances are used to transfrom those functions into virtually anything. While this project is very interesting, it is probably the most experimental one. You can also take a look at the overloaded package or at this novel categorifier plugin.
concat
Posts with mentions or reviews of concat.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-20.
-
Code generation with Haskell itself as the DSL
One step further is then (Compiling to Categories)[https://github.com/compiling-to-categories/concat] which tries to make the previous approach more convenient. It aims to overload any Haskell function from a -> b into a Category a b. Then, typeclass instances are used to transfrom those functions into virtually anything. While this project is very interesting, it is probably the most experimental one. You can also take a look at the overloaded package or at this novel categorifier plugin.
-
Is there an implementation of The Simple Essence of Automatic Differentiation (2018)?
I believe it is here: https://github.com/compiling-to-categories/concat
-
Alternative to arrows?
I still dream of an Arrow-inspired contender to the throne of do notation (both for Monads and Applicatives), but proc isn't it, at least not with its current desugaring. Even more exciting to think about a variant of proc that does some concat-like magic and replaces arr with something that still allows complex data routing while exposing more structure than an opaque a -> b.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing categorifier and concat you can also consider the following projects:
discokitty - An educational implementation of some aspects of the DisCoCat framework
knossos-ksc - Compiler with automatic differentiation
monoidal-functors - A library encoding monoidal functors and related structures in Haskell.
kernmantle - Braiding extensible effects together in a pipeline/workflow of tasks
rzk - An experimental proof assistant based on a type theory for synthetic ∞-categories.
free-functors - Provides free functors that are adjoint to functors that forget class constraints.
LtuPatternFactory - Lambda the ultimate Pattern Factory: FP, Haskell, Typeclassopedia vs Software Design Patterns
split-morphism - :curly_loop: Split Morphisms