Cake
dagger
Cake | dagger | |
---|---|---|
13 | 93 | |
3,823 | 10,287 | |
0.6% | 2.9% | |
8.0 | 9.9 | |
18 days ago | 2 days ago | |
C# | Go | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Cake
-
Unpopular opinion: CI/CD engines are an awful idea
This is why 90-99% of our builds are done with Cake. It isolates all of it and you can run the build locally if you want.
-
Cake v2.3.0 released - New Command aliases, New .NET Workload aliases, improved global caching of scripts, bug fixes, and more.
A good starting point of you want to get started with Cake is our website at https://cakebuild.net/
-
Cake : A C23 to C99 transpiler
I don't think it will get too much confusion, but there is a build system called Cake: https://cakebuild.net/
-
Achieving single command Infrastructure deployment using PowerShell DSC.
You may use other tools too: psake, make, cake, fake or any other *ake you are familiar with. I look at them as a tools that make build tasks behind simple commands and help me answer: How did I run that code again?
-
.NET build tool using Bullseye and SimpleExec
NAnt was quite a popular build tool used by projects of all sizes targeting .NET Framework on Windows. I have written many complex build systems using NAnt in the past. But XML based DSL was quite clunky to use and maintain. Besides, it was always a daunting task to explain to a new dev on the team. With .NET Core/.NET becoming a cross-platform framework, CAKE and FAKE gained a lot of adoption providing a C# and F# based DSL for build tasks accordingly.
-
Nuke Build - best build automation system
Cake (C# Make) - simple, easy to set up, and with a lot of extensions scripting with C#.
-
Can Cake be used to build a .NET Core 3.1 console application for Windows, Linux and Mac... on a Windows machine?
I got the example and the answer I needed on this thread: https://github.com/cake-build/cake/discussions/3564
-
Creating reusable build scripts with NUKE components
For those not familiar with it, Cake is a build automation system with a C#-based DSL. It is based on the concept of tasks, which are small units of work, like restoring packages, building, or testing, which can have dependencies on, or trigger, other tasks.
-
A super simple make wrapper for docker/podman that runs all your targets in a container - just a utility I put together to make my life slightly easier, nothing fancy
Just a note: there's already a very active community of the same name for the build utility Cake.
-
A stupid simple make wrapper that makes my life easier
Looks interesting! Although the name clashes with Cake (C# Make) project which could be confusing - https://cakebuild.net/
dagger
- Dagger: Programmable open source CI/CD engine that runs pipelines in containers
-
Nix is a better Docker image builder than Docker's image builder
The fact that I couldn't point to one page on the docs that shows the tl;dr or the what problem is this solving
https://docs.dagger.io/quickstart/562821/hello just emits "Hello, world!" which is fantastic if you're writing a programming language but less helpful if you're trying to replace a CI/CD pipeline. Then, https://docs.dagger.io/quickstart/292472/arguments doubles down on that fallacy by going whole hog into "if you need printf in your pipline, dagger's got your back". The subsequent pages have a lot of english with little concrete examples of what's being shown.
I summarized my complaint in the linked thread as "less cowsay in the examples" but to be honest there are upteen bazillion GitHub Actions out in the world, not the very least of which your GHA pipelines use some https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/v0.10.2/.github/workfl... https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/v0.10.2/.github/workfl... so demonstrate to a potential user how they'd run any such pipeline in dagger, locally, or in Jenkins, or whatever by leveraging reusable CI functions that setup go or run trivy
Related to that, I was going to say "try incorporating some of the dagger that builds dagger" but while digging up an example, it seems that dagger doesn't make use of the functions yet <https://github.com/dagger/dagger/tree/v0.10.2/ci#readme> which is made worse by the perpetual reference to them as their internal codename of Zenith. So, even if it's not invoked by CI yet, pointing to a WIP PR or branch or something to give folks who have CI/CD problems in their head something concrete to map into how GHA or GitLabCI or Jenkins or something would go a long way
-
Testcontainers
> GHA has "service containers", but unfortunately the feature is too basic to address real-world use cases: it assumes a container image can just β¦ boot! β¦ and only talk to the code via the network. Real world use cases often require serialized steps between the test & the dependencies, e.g., to create or init database dirs, set up certs, etc.)
My biased recommendation is to write a custom Dagger function, and run it in your GHA workflow. https://dagger.io
If you find me on the Dagger discord, I will gladly write a code snippet summarizing what I have in mind, based on what you explained of your CI stack. We use GHA ourselves and use this pattern to great effect.
Disclaimer: I work there :)
-
BuildKit in depth: Docker's build engine explained
Dagger (https://dagger.io) is a great way to use BuildKit through language SDKs. It's such a better paradigm, I cannot imagine going back.
Dagger is by the same folks that brought us Docker. This is their fresh take on solving the problem of container building and much more. BuildKit can more than build images and Dagger unlocks it for you.
-
Cloud, why so difficult? π€·ββοΈ
And suddenly, it's almost painfully obvious where all the pain came from. Cloud applications today are simply a patchwork of disconnected pieces. I have a compiler for my infrastructure, another for my functions, another for my containers, another for my CI/CD pipelines. Each one takes its job super seriously, and keeps me safe and happy inside each of these machines, but my application is not running on a single machine anymore, my application is running on the cloud.
-
Share your DevOps setups
That said I've been moving my CI/CD to https://dagger.io/ which has been FANTASTIC. It's code based so you can define all your pipelines in Go, Python, or Javascript and they all run on containers so I can run actions locally without any special setup. Highly recommended.
-
Whatβs with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
You are right make is arcane. But it gets the job done. There are new exciting things happening in this area. Check out https://dagger.io.
-
Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
> but I'm not convinced it's ready to replace Gitlab CI.
The purpose of Dagger it's not to replace your entire CI (Gitlab in your case). As you can see from our website (https://dagger.io/engine), it works and integrates with all the current CI providers. Where Dagger really shines is to help you and your teams move all the artisanal scripts encoded in YAML into actual code and run them in containers through a fluent SDK which can be written in your language of choice. This unlocks a lot of benefits which are detailed in our docs (https://docs.dagger.io/).
> Dagger has one very big downside IMO: It does not have native integration with Gitlab, so you end up having to use Docker-in-Docker and just running dagger as a job in your pipeline.
This is not correct. Dagger doesn't depend on Docker. We're just conveniently using Docker (and other container runtimes) as it's generally available pretty much everywhere by default as a way to bootstrap the Dagger Engine. You can read more about the Dagger architecture here: https://github.com/dagger/dagger/blob/main/core/docs/d7yxc-o...
As you can see from our docs (https://docs.dagger.io/759201/gitlab-google-cloud/#step-5-cr...), we're leveraging the *default* Gitlab CI `docker` service to bootstrap the engine. There's no `docker-in-docker` happening there.
> It clumps all your previously separated steps into a single step in the Gitlab pipeline.
This is also not the case, we should definitely improve our docs to reflect that. You can organize your dagger pipelines in multiple functions and call them in separate Gitlab jobs as you're currently doing. For example, you can do the following:
```.gitlab-ci.yml
-
Cicada β A FOSS, Cross-Platform Version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
Check out https://dagger.io/. Write declarative pipelines in code, reproducibly run anywhere.
-
Show HN: Togomak β declarative pipeline orchestrator based on HCL and Terraform
Is this similar to Dagger[1] ?
[1] https://dagger.io
What are some alternatives?
NUKE - π The AKEless Build System for C#/.NET
earthly - Super simple build framework with fast, repeatable builds and an instantly familiar syntax β like Dockerfile and Makefile had a baby.
MSBuild - The Microsoft Build Engine (MSBuild) is the build platform for .NET and Visual Studio.
pipeline - A cloud-native Pipeline resource.
FAKE - FAKE - F# Make
gitlab-ci-local - Tired of pushing to test your .gitlab-ci.yml?
Psake - A build automation tool written in PowerShell
act - Run your GitHub Actions locally π
Invoke-Build - Build Automation in PowerShell
aws-cdk - The AWS Cloud Development Kit is a framework for defining cloud infrastructure in code
Nake - Magic script-based C# task runner for .NET Core
dagster - An orchestration platform for the development, production, and observation of data assets.