procs VS warg

Some terminals probably scroll sideways, but this `st` program seems to require running to completion. So, ^C does not give you any report at all.

While it does RSS not Proportional Set Size (PSS) { arguably parsing /proc/PID/smaps_rollup should be added } and does not integrate program launch with tracking or use netlink to track making kids, an alternative that might interest some is a scrolling terminal kind of log report out of the Nim https://github.com/c-blake/procs .

    pd -pBHd1 -f "%N %R %< %> %J %a" $(pf firefox)

I don't know about all your other questions, but the https://github.com/c-blake/cligen CLI framework seems much lower effort / ceremony than even Rust's `argh` and is just about as old as `clap` (both started 8 years ago in 2015).

There are over 50 CLI utilities at https://github.com/c-blake/bu, many of which do something novel rather than just "re-doing ls/find/cat with a twist". While they are really more an "ls/ps construction toolkits" with some default configs to get people going, I think https://github.com/c-blake/lc and https://github.com/c-blake/procs are nicer than Rust alternatives. I mention these since you seem interested in such tools.

Since `ps` is featuring prominently here, folks might be interested in https://github.com/c-blake/procs which is a color ps (Linux-only right now). It has a more canonical CLI since it is based upon https://github.com/c-blake/cligen. It actually does subcommands, too (display, find, scrollsys) and so it can replace pgrep, pkill, ps, etc., etc.

Funcopts aren't always appropriate, but boy do they make things more readable sometimes. I use them pervasively in warg to allow declarative nested CLI commands

I wrote my own! https://github.com/bbkane/warg/

Very useful! I'll be playing with the error tree additions and studying the HTTP interface extension to see if I can replicate the pattern for https://github.com/bbkane/warg values. Id like to be able to have value-specific output for different types of --help , even ones not in warg

I'm using to allow for custom flag types in my CLI parsing library- a lot less duplicate code

One thing that I find nicer with functional options is building tree-like data structures.

My command line parsing library uses them to declaratively build CLI apps with arbitrarily nested subcommands.

Some examples at https://github.com/bbkane/warg/tree/master/examples

I'm writing a CLI parsing library, and generics have let me consolidate most of the flag value functionality for different types. So the flags for dbz --level 9000 --type superSaiyan share most of the same code even though one is an int and one is a string. So much fewer copy-paste-modify lines of code now!

This is largely what the Azure CLI does. It simplifies even further by eliminating the no-value option. Instead, you pass "true" or "false" as the value ( --example true ). It's a little more verbose but very easy to parse/write/generate. I like this convention so much I stole it for my homemade Golang CLI parsing library https://github.com/bbkane/warg/ .