bulletproof-react VS realworld

Using -> this guide to help structure a project in a better way

bulletproof react

Well I’d definitely have a file structure in place. I use bullet proof react as my go to. But I mean like…I’d say there’s probably 10 things causing 90% of the problems. So things like folder structure, yes, but also how long the files are, I mean…how enmeshed it all is…maybe the naming conventions.

Follow this: https://github.com/alan2207/bulletproof-react

Your approach is similar to bulletproof-react, which I personally love. I have built projects of all sizes with it and the DX was always nice! Check it out if you want and good luck on your project 😁

Link for the lazy ones.

Not sure if this helps, but Bulletproof React is a very good architecture to React projects of any size. Maybe it can give you some insight on how to structure your project. Good luck!

Been content with how Bulletproof react does it, only thing missing for me is differentiation between views and components.

In light of all this, it became exceedingly clear that someone else needed to step in and help. Why not me? Well, it can be me. And, after 3 months of development, I am happy to announce (again) dwayne/elm-conduit (demo), an open-source Elm SPA for RealWorld's Medium.com clone.

https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld

It's just for web app (a Todo app). Your GIS AND CLI ideas are interesting, I haven't seen anything similar to realworld for those.

View on GitHub

So what would be a better benchmark? Perhaps a "standard" "real world" app, like https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld

Or something simpler?

RealWorld example app is a full-stack application called "Conduit" that consists of a backend that serves JSON API and a frontend UI. There are numerous implementations for different languages and frameworks, but in this tutorial you will be using the Spring backend and the React frontend.

Github has millions of projects, some large fraction with more than 100 stars, so it doesn't seem like you are searching very hard. But more importantly, why "100 stars"? Stars are meaningless and arbitrary. Many developers use stars like bookmarks. I just did a quick search and noticed a project like realworld (just a demo for learning, 65 contributors) has have more stars than Bitcoin (900+ developers, perhaps you have heard of it?)

I feel you, context API sometimes overcomplicates everything. Let me introduce to you RealWorld. It is a great project that uses composition to make its structure scalable. It is actually a codebase that implements various fragments of a larger scale project such as Medium or Twitter. Check it out here: https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld. I hope this helps!